GeForce RTX 4070 vs Intel Arc A580

Winner:
GeForce RTX 4070
Main Difference:
Significant headroom through 12GB VRAM and DLSS 3.5 support versus basic Alchemist performance.
Page Summary:
GeForce RTX 4070 wins by delivering a massive performance advantage and far superior power efficiency over the Intel Arc A580. While the Intel part serves the entry-level market, it lacks the raw horsepower, diverse software features, and memory capacity required for modern gaming needs at higher settings.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

GeForce RTX 4070

MSRP:
$549
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
5888
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1920 MHz
Boost Clock:
2475 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
12.0 GB
L3 Cache:
12.0 GB
TDP:
200 W
Socket:
192 bit
Bus Width:
192 bit
Release Date:
2023-04-12
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
58.4
54.9
1440p
47.8
42.7
4K
34.1
34.1
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A580

MSRP:
$179
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3072
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1700 MHz
Boost Clock:
2000 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
175 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2023-10-10
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
24.2
24
1440p
19.5
16.2
4K
15.4
10.6
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

GeForce RTX 4070
Gaming Analysis:

The GeForce RTX 4070 occupies a specialized midrange space where high-resolution performance and power efficiency actually overlap. It handles heavy visuals with a level of restraint that makes older flagships feel unnecessarily loud and hot. While it can reach into higher resolutions, it functions most effectively when pushed at its target mid-tier resolution. Attempting to drive high-refresh displays at native 4K will eventually show the hardware limits, but for anything less demanding, the experience remains responsive.

The 12GB VRAM buffer serves as a reliable middle ground for current titles. It provides a significant margin over lower-tier cards that are beginning to struggle, though it does not offer the bottomless overhead found in enthusiast-class hardware. In titles with heavy texture loads, this GDDR6X capacity allows for high-quality assets without the stuttering or asset pop-in that can disrupt the flow of play. It manages to stay ahead of the curve for now, even if ultra-heavy texture packs in the future might eventually test its limits.

  • Mid-resolution gaming is the sweet spot for this architecture, where it delivers smooth motion across demanding modern libraries.
  • The 46 dedicated Ray Tracing cores make complex lighting and reflections a practical choice rather than a theoretical one.
  • The 192-bit memory bus is balanced for its primary use case, though it can act as a natural ceiling during heavy 4K workloads compared to the Ti variants.
  • DLSS 3 and Frame Generation provide a significant lift when a title feels particularly heavy, using AI to maintain fluidity even in taxing environments.
  • At a launch MSRP of $549, it matches the raw output of previous-generation flagships while pulling significantly less power, helping keep thermal output low during extended sessions.

Ray tracing on this card is a tangible feature rather than a checkbox. It maintains sharp reflections and realistic shadows without forcing a compromise that ruins the experience. Because it utilizes the Ada Lovelace architecture, the fourth-gen Tensor cores can step in with AI reconstruction to keep the image crisp when the path-tracing math gets heavy. It creates a stable balance where you can actually enjoy the lighting effects instead of worrying about the performance cost.

Intel Arc A580
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A580 is a 1080p gaming card that serves as a competent entry point for budget builds but lacks the raw muscle to maintain fluidity at higher resolutions. While it sits on a fast 256-bit memory bus that helps it stay responsive, the Xe-HPG silicon is tuned for standard high-definition monitors. If you try to push this card to run 1440p on modern titles, you will likely encounter chugging frame rates and a loss of responsive snap during fast motion. It is a solid choice for the 1080p gamer who wants high frame rates in esports titles, but it finds its limit when you step into heavier open-world environments.

With 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, your texture budget requires careful management because that amount is becoming the floor for modern software. You can expect crisp visuals on High settings in older titles, but in newer games, you will likely need to drop textures to Medium to avoid stuttering or sudden hitches when you turn a corner in-game. The card has the bandwidth to move data quickly across its wide bus, but the memory capacity is not deep enough for the massive uncompressed texture packs common in current releases.

  • The standard rasterization performance at 1080p is its strongest suit, delivering smooth movement in Vulkan-based games where the Intel drivers are most mature.
  • Ray tracing performance is surprisingly competent for a budget card, holding its ground well thanks to 24 dedicated Ray Tracing units.
  • Using Ray Tracing at 1080p is viable if you pair it with XeSS upscaling, which helps clean up the image and recover performance lost to complex lighting calculations.
  • At 1440p, the performance drops off significantly, particularly in DirectX titles where the driver overhead still causes inconsistent frame times.
  • While the card handles reflections and shadows better than many rivals in its class, it enters slide-show territory when pushed to 4K resolutions.

You must keep the power draw in mind because this card is remarkably thirsty for the level of performance it provides. It pulls over 200W during intense gaming sessions, which is significantly more heat and electricity than some competing cards. This means your case will get warmer and your fans will likely spin louder than they would with a more efficient rival. To support this card and a standard system, a 550W power supply is a sensible minimum. It is a capable, gritty performer for the 1080p enthusiast, but the high power draw and 8GB VRAM limit mean it is a tool for the present rather than a long-term investment. Given its launch MSRP of $179, it offers a specific path into modern features for those who do not mind the trade-off in efficiency.

GeForce RTX 4070
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming results establish this card as a high-performance choice for entertainment, its utility changes when moving into professional software where stability and memory management take priority. It serves as a reliable link between enthusiast projects and more demanding creative work. The architecture provides access to a stable ecosystem that remains a benchmark for various 3D and video applications. Choosing this hardware ensures a level of software compatibility that can prevent the disruptions often associated with less established drivers, making it a dependable option for anyone who needs their machine to stay functional during long render cycles.

The 12GB VRAM buffer offers substantial space for most high-resolution video timelines and standard 3D textures, though it does represent a definitive boundary. If a project involves extremely high-resolution RAW footage or massive geometric scenes, the system will eventually reach its memory limit. When that occurs, the hardware has to move data back to system memory, which often leads to a noticeable drop in overall responsiveness. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth keeps many interactions snappy, yet the memory configuration can feel somewhat restrictive during deep archival exports or when working with uncompressed layers that demand massive throughput.

  • The 29.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power ensures that viewport interactions in 3D applications remain fluid even as light and shadow calculations become more complex.
  • The eighth-gen NVENC hardware includes AV1 encoding, allowing for high-quality video exports and streams that do not rely on the central processor to handle the heavy lifting.
  • Forty-six dedicated Ray Tracing cores allow for physically accurate lighting previews to happen in real-time within supported creative suites.
  • Power efficiency is a major strength, as it maintains high output while drawing roughly 186 watts, which prevents the workspace from overheating during multi-hour rendering sessions.
  • The 5888 shading units provide the necessary parallel processing to handle intensive tasks like AI-assisted noise reduction or complex image manipulation across large batches of files.

This card functions best as a tool for efficiency within its specific technical guardrails. It lacks the massive overhead found in the highest-tier enthusiast models, so users must be mindful of their project scale to avoid memory bottlenecks. It is built for a professional who needs to transition between a 3D modeling environment and a video editing suite without encountering the stability issues that plague a less focused workstation config. It represents a practical balance where the hardware stays out of the way of the work. If your daily tasks involve massive simulations or high-bitrate 8K projects, the 12GB capacity may eventually require more careful asset management as software evolves.

Intel Arc A580
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A580 is defined by 1080p stability, shifting to a creative timeline introduces a different set of physical demands on the Xe-HPG architecture. Moving from short bursts of activity into a workstation role requires looking at how the silicon handles sustained data throughput during a long render or a complex 3D export. The high power draw mentioned previously carries over into productivity tasks, where the card pulls significant wattage that produces noticeable heat. You will likely hear the cooling fans working hard to keep temperatures under control when you are grinding through a project. It is a loud, functional experience that reminds you this hardware was built for raw capability rather than thermal silence.

The 8.0 GB VRAM buffer behaves as a hard border for your creative projects. If you are working on standard high-definition video projects or basic 4K cuts, the card feels responsive and manages the assets without much friction. The moment you start stacking heavy color grades or noise reduction, you might encounter significant system hitching because that memory capacity is the floor for modern professional software. However, the 256-bit memory bus provides a genuine advantage many budget contenders lack. With 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, scrubbing through the footage you can fit into memory feels strikingly snappy. It avoids the sticky lag often found on cards with narrower interfaces and moves data with the confidence of a much heavier component.

  • The hardware media engine is a primary reason to consider this card for a work build, as it offers full AV1 encoding and decoding features that are often missing from older budget hardware.
  • Intel QuickSync allows a compatible processor and this discrete card to share the workload during exports, though you must occasionally manage driver updates to ensure professional software recognizes the hardware correctly.
  • The 24 Ray Tracing cores are surprisingly functional for 3D modeling in viewport environments, holding their ground well when handling light and shadow calculations.
  • With 24.6 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, the card can serve as a budget entry point for local AI tasks or neural filters that do not exceed the onboard memory capacity.
  • Scientific simulations needing specialized precision are not the focus here, as the hardware is clearly tuned for creative media and visual tasks rather than high-level research.

Choosing this hardware for a professional environment means accepting a specific kind of ecosystem friction. You are forgoing the longstanding stability of established competitors, so you must be comfortable with the occasional driver hiccup or the need to check compatibility before updating your software. If your income depends on hitting a strict deadline every few hours, the occasional instability might be an issue. For a freelance editor on a budget or a student who needs powerful hardware encoding for video projects, the Arc A580 is a calculated choice. It provides professional-grade video tools in a package that requires a steady hand to manage the high power consumption and evolving driver landscape. Given its launch MSRP of $179, it represents a specific path into advanced media features for those who prioritize bandwidth over a larger memory pool.

GeForce RTX 4070
Feature Analysis:

A 200W TDP makes this hardware remarkably easy to manage within a standard mid-sized case since it does not generate the massive thermal output seen in higher-tier parts. You can achieve a stable build without investing in an oversized cooling solution or a complex fan configuration because the architecture prioritizes efficiency per watt. This lower power draw directly translates to a quieter workspace during heavy cycles, allowing the card to maintain its clock speeds without pushing the fans to distracting levels. It is a polite component that does not demand you overhaul your entire thermal strategy just to keep it from hitting its temperature ceiling.

The 12GB VRAM buffer sits at a transitional point for high-resolution textures and local AI workloads. While it remains comfortable for standard assets at 1440p, pushing into 4K packs or complex lighting mods may eventually lead to memory pressure that requires minor setting adjustments. This capacity provides enough room for the current gaming landscape, but it lacks the heavy overhead found in flagship models meant to act as a generational anchor for the next several years. You are buying an efficient tool that handles modern requirements with ease, though you must stay mindful of how texture quality settings impact the memory limit as software demands continue to climb.

  • The single 16-pin power connector requires careful Cable management to ensure the plug is fully seated and the cable has a natural curve without being pressed firmly against the side of the chassis.
  • A 650W power supply provides the necessary headroom to handle the sudden power spikes that occur when the silicon shifts from a resting state to a full rendering load.
  • Utilizing a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures that the GPU has access to the full available bandwidth even if you are installing it into a slightly older motherboard platform.
  • The 200W typical power draw keeps the internal case temperature low, which helps prevent other sensitive components like M.2 drives from picking up excess heat.
  • Ada Lovelace architecture optimizations mean this card delivers significant throughput while consuming far less electricity than previous-generation hardware with similar raw performance.

Operating this card is a predictable experience as long as you provide the suggested power headroom and respect the specific memory boundaries of the 12GB buffer. It is a focused workhorse that avoids the heat and power baggage often associated with high-end enthusiast desktop builds. This hardware is the definitive choice for a builder who wants a modern feature set and high efficiency without the need for a massive power supply or a giant enclosure. It delivers a refined experience that stays out of its own way, provided you remain realistic about the texture limits at the highest resolutions.

Intel Arc A580
Feature Analysis:

A typical 175W TDP rating suggests a mid-range thermal profile, but the physical reality of the Xe-HPG architecture is that it pushes considerable heat into your chassis during sustained use. This power demand is high for an entry-level part, meaning your case airflow needs to be active rather than passive to prevent the ambient temperature from climbing. While the official minimum specification suggests a 450W power supply, a 550W unit is the safer choice to handle the power spikes common with these Alchemist chips. Using a power supply with a bit more breathing room ensures the system remains stable when the hardware is under full load.

The 8.0 GB VRAM capacity serves as a strict boundary for your visual settings, acting as a ceiling that stays relevant throughout the life of the build. In modern titles, this amount of memory is the baseline, often requiring you to stay at 1080p and avoid the highest texture presets to maintain a smooth experience. The 256-bit bus helps move data with significant speed, yet the physical capacity is shallow enough that 1440p textures can quickly lead to stuttering. It is a build designed for the standard high-definition era, requiring a user who is comfortable managing settings rather than set-and-forget high-resolution gaming.

  • The card utilizes two standard 8-pin power connectors, which avoids the need for specialized adapters and ensures compatibility with traditional power supply cables.
  • A full PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides the maximum available bandwidth, ensuring the card does not suffer from the performance penalties sometimes found on budget hardware with fewer lanes.
  • The hardware is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, which introduced dedicated silicon for complex tasks like ray tracing and AI-enhanced upscaling.
  • Integrating this hardware into your build requires a motherboard that supports Resizable BAR, as the architecture relies heavily on this feature to function at its intended speed.
  • Early software hurdles have largely been addressed through consistent updates, though the platform still requires a more hands-on approach to driver management than established rivals.

Building with the Arc A580 means accepting a specific kind of technical friction in exchange for its unique feature set. You are choosing a path that prioritizes raw bandwidth and modern architecture over the polished, plug-and-play nature of more expensive ecosystems. Because it draws a notable amount of electricity for its performance class, the noise and heat from your cooling fans will be a constant presence during heavy sessions. It serves as a gritty, capable entry point into modern computing for those who understand that the 8.0 GB limit and the thermal output are the primary trade-offs for its launch MSRP of $179.

GeForce RTX 4070
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP $549
Release Date 2023-04-12
Chipset Manufacturer NVIDIA
Memory Size 12 GB
Memory Type GDDR6X
Memory Bus 192 bit
Memory Clock 1313 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 504.2 GB/s
Base Clock 1920 MHz
Boost Clock 2475 MHz
Shading Units 5888
Ray Tracing Cores 46
TMUs 184
ROPs 64
Pixel Rate 158.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 455.4 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 29.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 29.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 455.4 GFLOPS
Architecture Ada Lovelace
Process Size 5 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 16-pin
TDP 200 W
Suggested PSU 650 W
Intel Arc A580
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A580
MSRP $179
Release Date 2023-10-10
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 1700 MHz
Boost Clock 2000 MHz
Shading Units 3072
Ray Tracing Cores 24
TMUs 192
ROPs 96
Pixel Rate 192 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 384 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 24.6 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 1.5 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin
TDP 175 W
Suggested PSU 550 W

Final Verdict

The GeForce RTX 4070 dominates this matchup by offering a clear performance lead that often exceeds double the frame output of the opposition in taxing scenarios. Built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, it brings a sophisticated feature set including DLSS 3.5 and specialized hardware for frame generation that makes a tangible difference in smoothness. The 12GB of GDDR6X VRAM provides a much needed safety net for modern textures and asset-heavy environments that quickly overwhelm smaller buffers. It is simply a more capable piece of silicon for anyone looking to push their settings higher without worrying about sudden stutters or driver inconsistencies. While its $549 MSRP reflects its position as a serious mid-range contender, the efficiency gain is remarkable. It draws significantly less power relative to the work it does compared to the Intel Arc A580 which can be quite thirsty given its performance bracket.

Intel Arc A580 occupies a very different space with its $179 MSRP and targeted 8GB VRAM capacity. It serves as a gateway for budget builds, but the Xe-HPG architecture struggles to keep pace when ray tracing or high resolutions enter the conversation. Software stability remains a work in progress for the Alchemist platform, leading to occasional headaches that the NVIDIA ecosystem generally avoids through years of driver refinement. For users prioritizing a hassle-free experience with superior longevity, the NVIDIA card is the rational choice. It manages complex lighting and high-speed data transfers with ease while maintaining lower thermal output. The memory bus and bandwidth on the Intel card are respectable, but they cannot compensate for the raw gap in shading units and architectural throughput found in the NVIDIA hardware.

  • Performance: The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly faster, often providing a lead well over 140 percent in rasterization and even greater advantages in ray-traced workloads.
  • Technology: NVIDIA includes DLSS 3.5 which uses AI to boost frame rates and clarity, whereas Intel must rely on XeSS which currently has less widespread adoption.
  • Efficiency: Despite the higher performance tier, the GeForce RTX 4070 is built on a 5nm process that ensures better performance-per-watt than the 6nm Intel part.
  • Recommendation: Buy GeForce RTX 4070 if you want a powerful card that handles intensive games and professional apps with total stability.
  • Recommendation: Buy Intel Arc A580 if you are on a strict budget and only need basic high-definition gaming capabilities.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.