GeForce RTX 4070 vs Intel Arc A750

Winner:
GeForce RTX 4070
Main Difference:
Over double the gaming performance and four gigabytes of additional video memory
Page Summary:
GeForce RTX 4070 dominates this matchup by offering more than twice the speed in standard gaming and ray tracing. While the Intel Arc A750 targets the entry level with an aggressive $269 MSRP, the NVIDIA card provides a massive generational leap in efficiency, memory capacity, and advanced frame generation features.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

GeForce RTX 4070

MSRP:
$549
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
5888
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1920 MHz
Boost Clock:
2475 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
12.0 GB
L3 Cache:
12.0 GB
TDP:
200 W
Socket:
192 bit
Bus Width:
192 bit
Release Date:
2023-04-12
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
58.4
54.9
1440p
47.8
42.7
4K
34.1
34.1
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A750

MSRP:
$269
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3584
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
2050 MHz
Boost Clock:
2400 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
225 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2022-10-12
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
25.8
25
1440p
21.6
19.1
4K
15.9
12.1
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

GeForce RTX 4070
Gaming Analysis:

The GeForce RTX 4070 occupies a specialized midrange space where high-resolution performance and power efficiency actually overlap. It handles heavy visuals with a level of restraint that makes older flagships feel unnecessarily loud and hot. While it can reach into higher resolutions, it functions most effectively when pushed at its target mid-tier resolution. Attempting to drive high-refresh displays at native 4K will eventually show the hardware limits, but for anything less demanding, the experience remains responsive.

The 12GB VRAM buffer serves as a reliable middle ground for current titles. It provides a significant margin over lower-tier cards that are beginning to struggle, though it does not offer the bottomless overhead found in enthusiast-class hardware. In titles with heavy texture loads, this GDDR6X capacity allows for high-quality assets without the stuttering or asset pop-in that can disrupt the flow of play. It manages to stay ahead of the curve for now, even if ultra-heavy texture packs in the future might eventually test its limits.

  • Mid-resolution gaming is the sweet spot for this architecture, where it delivers smooth motion across demanding modern libraries.
  • The 46 dedicated Ray Tracing cores make complex lighting and reflections a practical choice rather than a theoretical one.
  • The 192-bit memory bus is balanced for its primary use case, though it can act as a natural ceiling during heavy 4K workloads compared to the Ti variants.
  • DLSS 3 and Frame Generation provide a significant lift when a title feels particularly heavy, using AI to maintain fluidity even in taxing environments.
  • At a launch MSRP of $549, it matches the raw output of previous-generation flagships while pulling significantly less power, helping keep thermal output low during extended sessions.

Ray tracing on this card is a tangible feature rather than a checkbox. It maintains sharp reflections and realistic shadows without forcing a compromise that ruins the experience. Because it utilizes the Ada Lovelace architecture, the fourth-gen Tensor cores can step in with AI reconstruction to keep the image crisp when the path-tracing math gets heavy. It creates a stable balance where you can actually enjoy the lighting effects instead of worrying about the performance cost.

Intel Arc A750
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A750 is built for steady performance at 1080p, and while it relies on the older Xe-HPG architecture, it handles standard resolutions with surprising competence. You can expect a fluid experience in a wide variety of titles if you keep your expectations targeted toward a standard display setup. While the hardware can stretch into higher resolutions, it lacks the raw headroom to remain consistently smooth as the pixel count climbs, often leads to a heavy performance trade-off in demanding scenes.

With 8GB of GDDR6 memory, you are working within a clear ceiling for texture quality. In modern titles that push high memory demands, this capacity serves as a bottleneck that prevents you from maxing out every visual slider. Trying to load massive texture packs or ultra-level assets may lead to stuttering or visible hitches when the card runs out of room. The 256-bit bus width is wide for a card at its launch MSRP of $269, which helps data move quickly through the pipeline, but the 8GB limit remains the final decider for your settings.

The hardware includes 28 ray tracing cores, but enabling these effects usually comes with a massive cost to stability. Because these are first-generation cores, they often struggle with the heavy math required for complex lighting or sharp reflections. Toggling these features on can quickly turn a fluid game into a choppy experience. If you decide to use these effects, you will need to rely on Intel XeSS upscaling to regain a playable feel. Without that AI-assisted help, native ray tracing performance is generally too heavy for most AAA games, making standard rasterized settings the better path for a stable experience.

  • 1080p Gaming: A reliable and fluid choice for high settings in most titles.
  • 1440p Gaming: Performance is inconsistent and typically requires dropping to medium settings to stay smooth.
  • 4K Gaming: The hardware lacks the resources for a playable experience at this resolution.
  • Texture Quality: Capped by the 8GB ceiling, requiring more conservative choices in memory-heavy releases.
  • Lighting Effects: Ray tracing is present but functions mostly as an enthusiast experiment due to the steep performance tax.
GeForce RTX 4070
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming results establish this card as a high-performance choice for entertainment, its utility changes when moving into professional software where stability and memory management take priority. It serves as a reliable link between enthusiast projects and more demanding creative work. The architecture provides access to a stable ecosystem that remains a benchmark for various 3D and video applications. Choosing this hardware ensures a level of software compatibility that can prevent the disruptions often associated with less established drivers, making it a dependable option for anyone who needs their machine to stay functional during long render cycles.

The 12GB VRAM buffer offers substantial space for most high-resolution video timelines and standard 3D textures, though it does represent a definitive boundary. If a project involves extremely high-resolution RAW footage or massive geometric scenes, the system will eventually reach its memory limit. When that occurs, the hardware has to move data back to system memory, which often leads to a noticeable drop in overall responsiveness. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth keeps many interactions snappy, yet the memory configuration can feel somewhat restrictive during deep archival exports or when working with uncompressed layers that demand massive throughput.

  • The 29.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power ensures that viewport interactions in 3D applications remain fluid even as light and shadow calculations become more complex.
  • The eighth-gen NVENC hardware includes AV1 encoding, allowing for high-quality video exports and streams that do not rely on the central processor to handle the heavy lifting.
  • Forty-six dedicated Ray Tracing cores allow for physically accurate lighting previews to happen in real-time within supported creative suites.
  • Power efficiency is a major strength, as it maintains high output while drawing roughly 186 watts, which prevents the workspace from overheating during multi-hour rendering sessions.
  • The 5888 shading units provide the necessary parallel processing to handle intensive tasks like AI-assisted noise reduction or complex image manipulation across large batches of files.

This card functions best as a tool for efficiency within its specific technical guardrails. It lacks the massive overhead found in the highest-tier enthusiast models, so users must be mindful of their project scale to avoid memory bottlenecks. It is built for a professional who needs to transition between a 3D modeling environment and a video editing suite without encountering the stability issues that plague a less focused workstation config. It represents a practical balance where the hardware stays out of the way of the work. If your daily tasks involve massive simulations or high-bitrate 8K projects, the 12GB capacity may eventually require more careful asset management as software evolves.

Intel Arc A750
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A750 translates well to standard displays, moving into a professional workload highlights the specific strengths and physical limitations of the Xe-HPG architecture. You are shifting from a hobbyist environment to one where driver stability and software compatibility dictate your daily pace. It is a capable tool for entry-level creators who need high-speed data paths, but it requires a disciplined approach to asset management to avoid hitting the hardware's fixed hardware ceilings. You cannot treat a mid-tier card like a dedicated workstation flagship and expect it to handle massive, unoptimized projects without friction.

The 8GB VRAM buffer acts as a hard boundary for anyone working in 3D rendering or high-resolution video production. Attempting to edit a dense 4K timeline with multiple layers of color grading and complex effects can lead to significant slowdowns when the memory fills up. Professional rendering in applications like Blender often requires the entire scene to fit within this video memory, so 8GB does not provide much headroom for complex geometry or oversized textures. When your project exceeds this limit, the system must swap data to the slower system RAM, causing the creative process to lose its snappy feel. Large, high-density scenes are generally out of reach for this specific memory configuration.

The 256-bit bus width and 512 GB/s memory bandwidth are the standout technical features that help the card punch above its weight in specific tasks. When you are scrubbing through raw footage, this wide highway for data movement prevents the stuttering playback that often affects other cards in this tier. The inclusion of dedicated AV1 encoding is a practical advantage for modern streamers and video editors who need fast exports without relying entirely on the CPU. However, choosing this hardware means stepping away from the established CUDA ecosystem which remains a standard for many professional suites. You gain impressive raw compute through the 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, but you might spend more time managing software updates or ensuring your specific apps are fully optimized for Intel silicon.

  • Video Editing: The high memory bandwidth ensures responsive timeline scrubbing, though the 8GB buffer limits the complexity of 4K effects.
  • 3D Rendering: The 28 ray tracing cores assist with viewport interactivity, but the lack of traditional industry-standard software hooks may require extra configuration.
  • Encoding Power: The built-in AV1 encoder provides a modern solution for high-quality exports and efficient streaming workflows.
  • Computational Tasks: Strong raw compute figures handle standard rendering and AI-assisted image tools with competitive speed.
  • System Requirements: A 650W power supply is the recommended starting point to ensure the system remains stable under heavy sustained rendering loads.
GeForce RTX 4070
Feature Analysis:

A 200W TDP makes this hardware remarkably easy to manage within a standard mid-sized case since it does not generate the massive thermal output seen in higher-tier parts. You can achieve a stable build without investing in an oversized cooling solution or a complex fan configuration because the architecture prioritizes efficiency per watt. This lower power draw directly translates to a quieter workspace during heavy cycles, allowing the card to maintain its clock speeds without pushing the fans to distracting levels. It is a polite component that does not demand you overhaul your entire thermal strategy just to keep it from hitting its temperature ceiling.

The 12GB VRAM buffer sits at a transitional point for high-resolution textures and local AI workloads. While it remains comfortable for standard assets at 1440p, pushing into 4K packs or complex lighting mods may eventually lead to memory pressure that requires minor setting adjustments. This capacity provides enough room for the current gaming landscape, but it lacks the heavy overhead found in flagship models meant to act as a generational anchor for the next several years. You are buying an efficient tool that handles modern requirements with ease, though you must stay mindful of how texture quality settings impact the memory limit as software demands continue to climb.

  • The single 16-pin power connector requires careful Cable management to ensure the plug is fully seated and the cable has a natural curve without being pressed firmly against the side of the chassis.
  • A 650W power supply provides the necessary headroom to handle the sudden power spikes that occur when the silicon shifts from a resting state to a full rendering load.
  • Utilizing a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures that the GPU has access to the full available bandwidth even if you are installing it into a slightly older motherboard platform.
  • The 200W typical power draw keeps the internal case temperature low, which helps prevent other sensitive components like M.2 drives from picking up excess heat.
  • Ada Lovelace architecture optimizations mean this card delivers significant throughput while consuming far less electricity than previous-generation hardware with similar raw performance.

Operating this card is a predictable experience as long as you provide the suggested power headroom and respect the specific memory boundaries of the 12GB buffer. It is a focused workhorse that avoids the heat and power baggage often associated with high-end enthusiast desktop builds. This hardware is the definitive choice for a builder who wants a modern feature set and high efficiency without the need for a massive power supply or a giant enclosure. It delivers a refined experience that stays out of its own way, provided you remain realistic about the texture limits at the highest resolutions.

Intel Arc A750
Feature Analysis:

The 225W power draw stands out as the primary logistical hurdle for a build centered on the Intel Arc A750, as this hardware pulls more electricity than typically expected in this performance tier. While the base technical specification suggests a 550W power supply, you should pair this card with a 650W unit to accommodate the abrupt power spikes that occur during intensive gaming or complex rendering tasks. Providing this extra room ensures that your system does not shut down unexpectedly when the silicon demands a momentary surge of current. Because the card utilizes a standard combination of one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, you can rely on traditional power cables without the need for specialized adapters or the specific clearance requirements of modern high-wattage headers. This straightforward physical installation makes the card compatible with a wide variety of existing cases and legacy power supplies that haven't been updated for the newest standards.

The 8GB VRAM capacity represents a fixed ceiling that dictates your long-term resolution and texture settings regardless of other internal hardware strengths. While the 256-bit memory bus facilitates a high rate of data transfer, the physical volume of memory is small enough that high-resolution texture packs can quickly saturate the buffer. If you push the software beyond this 8GB limit, you are likely to encounter stuttering as the system struggles to manage data overflow between the card and the rest of your PC. It is a build reality that requires a more disciplined approach to settings, where choosing slightly lower presets often yields a much more stable and consistent experience than chasing visual extremes that the hardware cannot technically sustain over time.

Platform compatibility serves as the final non-negotiable requirement because the Xe-HPG architecture relies heavily on Resizable BAR to function at its intended level of performance. You must verify that your motherboard and processor support this feature, as failing to enable it in the BIOS will lead to a significant and noticeable loss in frame consistency and overall speed. This technical dependency makes the card a poor fit for older systems from the pre-2020 era that lack the necessary firmware support. While driver consistency has improved significantly since the initial launch of the platform, the Arc A750 still appeals most to the type of user who enjoys checking for software updates and fine-tuning system configurations to maximize hardware potential.

  • Power Management: The 225W TDP requires a 650W power supply to ensure stability against power fluctuations during heavy use.
  • Memory Boundaries: The 8GB VRAM limit makes 1080p the ideal target resolution to avoid stuttering caused by over-saturated video memory.
  • Cable Setup: Standard 6-pin and 8-pin power connectors provide broad compatibility with existing ATX power supplies.
  • Platform Connectivity: The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a full-speed data path, though the hardware effectively mandates Resizable BAR support.
  • Software Commitment: Optimal results require frequent driver updates and a motherboard BIOS modern enough to support current communication standards.
GeForce RTX 4070
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP $549
Release Date 2023-04-12
Chipset Manufacturer NVIDIA
Memory Size 12 GB
Memory Type GDDR6X
Memory Bus 192 bit
Memory Clock 1313 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 504.2 GB/s
Base Clock 1920 MHz
Boost Clock 2475 MHz
Shading Units 5888
Ray Tracing Cores 46
TMUs 184
ROPs 64
Pixel Rate 158.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 455.4 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 29.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 29.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 455.4 GFLOPS
Architecture Ada Lovelace
Process Size 5 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 16-pin
TDP 200 W
Suggested PSU 650 W
Intel Arc A750
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A750
MSRP $269
Release Date 2022-10-12
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 2050 MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz
Shading Units 3584
Ray Tracing Cores 28
TMUs 224
ROPs 112
Pixel Rate 268.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 537.6 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 34.4 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 17.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 2.2 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
TDP 225 W
Suggested PSU 650 W

Final Verdict

The GeForce RTX 4070 represents a massive step up in both raw power and modern feature support compared to the Intel Arc A750. While the Intel card entered the market at a $269 MSRP to challenge mid-range staples, the NVIDIA card arrived with a $549 MSRP and performance that fundamentally changes the experience. The most immediate advantage is the 12GB GDDR6X memory buffer. Having that extra capacity allows textures to load quickly and stay sharp without the stuttering or crashing issues that frequently plague hardware limited to 8GB when settings are pushed to the limit. The memory bandwidth on the NVIDIA side is backed by a much more efficient 5nm process, leading to a card that runs cool while delivering double the frames in most modern titles.

Ray tracing performance is where the gap truly widens into a chasm. The GeForce RTX 4070 features third-generation RT cores that handle lighting and reflections with a level of fluidity the Intel architecture cannot match. You also get access to the proprietary DLSS 3 suite, which uses frame generation to make games feel significantly smoother. The Intel Arc A750 is a respectable effort for its first generation, but its drivers and hardware often hit a wall in professional creative apps or heavy 3D rendering tasks. NVIDIA's established software ecosystem ensures that video editing and complex modeling remain stable and predictable. The power efficiency of the Ada Lovelace architecture means you get much more work done per watt than the Intel alternative.

  • Gaming Performance: NVIDIA more than doubles the output of the Intel card in standard rasterization and ray-traced workloads alike.
  • Memory Capacity: The 12GB buffer provides a necessary cushion for modern asset-heavy games that the 8GB Intel card lacks.
  • Software Support: DLSS 3 and the CUDA ecosystem offer a level of stability and performance gain that Intel's current software stack is still chasing.
  • Buy GeForce RTX 4070 if you want high refresh rate gaming and enough memory to handle modern titles and professional creative work for years.
  • Buy Intel Arc A750 if you are on a strict budget and only need a basic entry-point card for standard gaming at modest settings.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.