GeForce RTX 4080 vs Intel Arc A580

Winner:
GeForce RTX 4080
Main Difference:
Superior architecture and double the VRAM with much higher bandwidth
Page Summary:
GeForce RTX 4080 is the clear winner because it offers massive gains in architectural efficiency and memory capacity compared to the entry-level Intel hardware.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

GeForce RTX 4080

MSRP:
$1,199
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
9728
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
2205 MHz
Boost Clock:
2505 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
16.0 GB
L3 Cache:
16.0 GB
TDP:
320 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2022-09-20
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
82
82.2
1440p
72.5
67.6
4K
56.8
56.8
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A580

MSRP:
$179
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3072
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1700 MHz
Boost Clock:
2000 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
175 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2023-10-10
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
24.2
24
1440p
19.5
16.2
4K
15.4
10.6
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

GeForce RTX 4080
Gaming Analysis:

The GeForce RTX 4080 offers performance that firmly establishes it in the high-end enthusiast category, particularly for those targeting demanding resolutions. While it sits just below the top-tier flagship of the Ada Lovelace generation, it provides a substantial lead over mid-range options and ensures a fluid experience when playing at high 1440p settings. At 4K, this card manages heavy graphical loads with stability, allowing for high settings in modern titles without the stuttering often found on lesser hardware.

The 16GB GDDR6X VRAM buffer is a significant factor for future software demands. Because it features a 256-bit bus and a generous memory pool, you can set texture quality to the highest levels. This prevents the blurry assets or the sudden hitching that can happen when a card exceeds its available video memory during demanding scenes. The architecture provides enough overhead to handle high-resolution assets and complex geometry, maintaining consistent frame delivery in sprawling open-world environments.

  • 1080p Performance: This resolution will generally result in a CPU bottleneck as the GPU has more than enough power to spare.
  • 1440p Performance: This is a primary target for the card, offering high-fidelity visuals and high frame rates across the board.
  • 4K Performance: The card handles this resolution with ease, providing a stable experience that justifies the use of a high-density display.

Ray tracing is a specific strength of the Ada Lovelace architecture and the 76 dedicated Ray Tracing Cores on this model. While heavy lighting effects can tax many systems, this card processes complex reflections and global illumination with enough efficiency to keep the experience responsive. Because of the dedicated hardware, you obtain the visual depth of advanced lighting without the massive latency penalty that often makes gameplay feel heavy or sluggish on cards with fewer specialized cores.

  • Ray Tracing Stability: Clear and reliable performance even when multiple lighting effects are active simultaneously.
  • Upscaling Technology: Support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation provides a way to maintain fluidity in titles that put a heavy load on the processor.
  • Texture Quality: The 16GB memory capacity allows for ultra-level settings without worrying about memory-related slowdowns.
Intel Arc A580
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A580 is a 1080p gaming card that serves as a competent entry point for budget builds but lacks the raw muscle to maintain fluidity at higher resolutions. While it sits on a fast 256-bit memory bus that helps it stay responsive, the Xe-HPG silicon is tuned for standard high-definition monitors. If you try to push this card to run 1440p on modern titles, you will likely encounter chugging frame rates and a loss of responsive snap during fast motion. It is a solid choice for the 1080p gamer who wants high frame rates in esports titles, but it finds its limit when you step into heavier open-world environments.

With 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, your texture budget requires careful management because that amount is becoming the floor for modern software. You can expect crisp visuals on High settings in older titles, but in newer games, you will likely need to drop textures to Medium to avoid stuttering or sudden hitches when you turn a corner in-game. The card has the bandwidth to move data quickly across its wide bus, but the memory capacity is not deep enough for the massive uncompressed texture packs common in current releases.

  • The standard rasterization performance at 1080p is its strongest suit, delivering smooth movement in Vulkan-based games where the Intel drivers are most mature.
  • Ray tracing performance is surprisingly competent for a budget card, holding its ground well thanks to 24 dedicated Ray Tracing units.
  • Using Ray Tracing at 1080p is viable if you pair it with XeSS upscaling, which helps clean up the image and recover performance lost to complex lighting calculations.
  • At 1440p, the performance drops off significantly, particularly in DirectX titles where the driver overhead still causes inconsistent frame times.
  • While the card handles reflections and shadows better than many rivals in its class, it enters slide-show territory when pushed to 4K resolutions.

You must keep the power draw in mind because this card is remarkably thirsty for the level of performance it provides. It pulls over 200W during intense gaming sessions, which is significantly more heat and electricity than some competing cards. This means your case will get warmer and your fans will likely spin louder than they would with a more efficient rival. To support this card and a standard system, a 550W power supply is a sensible minimum. It is a capable, gritty performer for the 1080p enthusiast, but the high power draw and 8GB VRAM limit mean it is a tool for the present rather than a long-term investment. Given its launch MSRP of $179, it offers a specific path into modern features for those who do not mind the trade-off in efficiency.

GeForce RTX 4080
Productivity Analysis:

While this hardware excels at rendering high frame rates in entertainment, it functions as a reliable anchor for professional tasks that require consistent uptime and massive memory precision. Moving into a creative workload means shifting focus from visual smoothness to stability under heavy sustained loads. The architecture transitions from a gaming powerhouse to a specialized tool for complex renders and high resolution video editing without the typical performance drops seen in lower tier components. This model provides the necessary overhead for those whose work involves massive datasets or detailed 3D assets that require immense processing resources to maintain a responsive interface.

The 16GB GDDR6X memory pool represents a substantial technical floor for modern creative production. Working with high resolution timelines or training localized data models requires significant VRAM to prevent the software from falling back on slower system memory, which often results in sluggish behavior during active editing and previewing. This capacity allows you to keep multiple professional applications open simultaneously, such as a video editor and a heavy composition tool, without experiencing the hitching that occurs when memory limits are reached. It offers a comfortable margin for mid to high level professional projects, ensuring that asset heavy scenes and 4K footage remain manageable during the most demanding stages of the creative process.

  • CUDA Core Density: With 9728 cores, this hardware manages massive parallel processing tasks that significantly reduce the time spent waiting for complex effects to calculate.
  • Memory Bandwidth: The 256-bit bus and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth ensure that data moves quickly enough to prevent stutters when scrubbing through layers of high bitrate video.
  • Dual Encoder Efficiency: The inclusion of two dedicated encoding engines allows for faster exports in high resolution formats compared to cards that process video data through a single lane.
  • Ray Tracing Acceleration: The 76 specialized cores handle light transport and shadows in 3D viewport renders, making it possible to view changes in real time rather than waiting for low resolution previews.
  • Power Management: The Ada Lovelace architecture provides high performance levels while maintaining better thermal regulation than many previous generation flagship models.

The 48.7 TFLOPS of compute power ensures that modern AI tools and automated features within professional software suites feel nearly instantaneous. Whether you are using specialized filters or complex physics simulations, the hardware processes these intensive calculations with a level of speed that supports a natural flow state. You get a highly polished software integration that remains the industry standard for most creative plugins and rendering engines. This reliability is vital for meeting tight deadlines, as it avoids the need for constant troubleshooting or driver adjustments that can disrupt a professional environment. A power supply of at least 850W is recommended to support this internal system and ensure the hardware runs reliably under full production loads.

Intel Arc A580
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A580 is defined by 1080p stability, shifting to a creative timeline introduces a different set of physical demands on the Xe-HPG architecture. Moving from short bursts of activity into a workstation role requires looking at how the silicon handles sustained data throughput during a long render or a complex 3D export. The high power draw mentioned previously carries over into productivity tasks, where the card pulls significant wattage that produces noticeable heat. You will likely hear the cooling fans working hard to keep temperatures under control when you are grinding through a project. It is a loud, functional experience that reminds you this hardware was built for raw capability rather than thermal silence.

The 8.0 GB VRAM buffer behaves as a hard border for your creative projects. If you are working on standard high-definition video projects or basic 4K cuts, the card feels responsive and manages the assets without much friction. The moment you start stacking heavy color grades or noise reduction, you might encounter significant system hitching because that memory capacity is the floor for modern professional software. However, the 256-bit memory bus provides a genuine advantage many budget contenders lack. With 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, scrubbing through the footage you can fit into memory feels strikingly snappy. It avoids the sticky lag often found on cards with narrower interfaces and moves data with the confidence of a much heavier component.

  • The hardware media engine is a primary reason to consider this card for a work build, as it offers full AV1 encoding and decoding features that are often missing from older budget hardware.
  • Intel QuickSync allows a compatible processor and this discrete card to share the workload during exports, though you must occasionally manage driver updates to ensure professional software recognizes the hardware correctly.
  • The 24 Ray Tracing cores are surprisingly functional for 3D modeling in viewport environments, holding their ground well when handling light and shadow calculations.
  • With 24.6 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, the card can serve as a budget entry point for local AI tasks or neural filters that do not exceed the onboard memory capacity.
  • Scientific simulations needing specialized precision are not the focus here, as the hardware is clearly tuned for creative media and visual tasks rather than high-level research.

Choosing this hardware for a professional environment means accepting a specific kind of ecosystem friction. You are forgoing the longstanding stability of established competitors, so you must be comfortable with the occasional driver hiccup or the need to check compatibility before updating your software. If your income depends on hitting a strict deadline every few hours, the occasional instability might be an issue. For a freelance editor on a budget or a student who needs powerful hardware encoding for video projects, the Arc A580 is a calculated choice. It provides professional-grade video tools in a package that requires a steady hand to manage the high power consumption and evolving driver landscape. Given its launch MSRP of $179, it represents a specific path into advanced media features for those who prioritize bandwidth over a larger memory pool.

GeForce RTX 4080
Feature Analysis:

A power supply rating of 850W provides the necessary headroom to manage the 320W typical TDP of this hardware, especially when accounting for the transient power spikes that occur during intense graphical transitions. While the base specification often suggests a lower starting point, higher wattage units ensure the system remains stable and prevents unexpected shutdowns when the hardware draws maximum current under load. This requirement places a premium on your choice of power delivery and necessitates a case with efficient airflow to move the substantial heat generated during long sessions. Without a clear path for exhaust, the internal ambient temperature can rise quickly enough to force the fans onto higher, louder speed profiles to maintain safe operation.

The single 16-pin power connector requires careful attention during the assembly process to ensure the cable is fully seated and has enough room for a natural curve. This interface is often stiffer than legacy cables, so checking for vertical clearance between the plug and your side panel is a practical necessity for a clean build. If you are using a standard power supply, the included adapter adds significant bulk that must be managed behind the motherboard tray or inside the shroud to prevent it from pressing against the internal components. Transitioning to a native cable on a newer power supply platform can simplify this cable management significantly by removing the need for multiple bulky adapters.

  • Physical Layout: The physical size of this card and the 16-pin connector demand a chassis with enough width to avoid putting lateral pressure on the power pins which can lead to connection issues.
  • Interface Bandwidth: Running on a full PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures that data moves between the system and the 16GB VRAM pool without the bandwidth restrictions found on lower-tier cards.
  • Thermal Design: The 320W thermal output means that a high-density fin stack and multiple fans are required, making this card a large triple-slot part in almost every available variant.
  • High Resolution Assets: The 16GB memory buffer acts as a safeguard when loading massive textures at 4K, ensuring that the GPU does not have to dip into slower system RAM during gameplay.
  • System Synergy: Pairing this hardware with a high-speed NVMe drive allows for faster asset streaming, which is essential for taking full advantage of the large memory capacity and the Ada Lovelace architecture.

The 256-bit memory bus provides a high level of bandwidth that matches the 16GB GDDR6X capacity, creating a balanced path for data-heavy professional assets and modern gaming textures. While this architecture is highly efficient, it still demands a commitment to a high-quality internal environment with plenty of breathing room for the cooling solution to function as intended. Neglecting case cooling can result in the fans working harder than necessary, which trade-offs acoustic comfort for thermal stability. By providing a stable power source and unobstructed air intake, you ensure the hardware operates at its peak frequency without the thermal throttling that can occur in cramped or poorly ventilated enclosures.

Intel Arc A580
Feature Analysis:

A typical 175W TDP rating suggests a mid-range thermal profile, but the physical reality of the Xe-HPG architecture is that it pushes considerable heat into your chassis during sustained use. This power demand is high for an entry-level part, meaning your case airflow needs to be active rather than passive to prevent the ambient temperature from climbing. While the official minimum specification suggests a 450W power supply, a 550W unit is the safer choice to handle the power spikes common with these Alchemist chips. Using a power supply with a bit more breathing room ensures the system remains stable when the hardware is under full load.

The 8.0 GB VRAM capacity serves as a strict boundary for your visual settings, acting as a ceiling that stays relevant throughout the life of the build. In modern titles, this amount of memory is the baseline, often requiring you to stay at 1080p and avoid the highest texture presets to maintain a smooth experience. The 256-bit bus helps move data with significant speed, yet the physical capacity is shallow enough that 1440p textures can quickly lead to stuttering. It is a build designed for the standard high-definition era, requiring a user who is comfortable managing settings rather than set-and-forget high-resolution gaming.

  • The card utilizes two standard 8-pin power connectors, which avoids the need for specialized adapters and ensures compatibility with traditional power supply cables.
  • A full PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides the maximum available bandwidth, ensuring the card does not suffer from the performance penalties sometimes found on budget hardware with fewer lanes.
  • The hardware is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, which introduced dedicated silicon for complex tasks like ray tracing and AI-enhanced upscaling.
  • Integrating this hardware into your build requires a motherboard that supports Resizable BAR, as the architecture relies heavily on this feature to function at its intended speed.
  • Early software hurdles have largely been addressed through consistent updates, though the platform still requires a more hands-on approach to driver management than established rivals.

Building with the Arc A580 means accepting a specific kind of technical friction in exchange for its unique feature set. You are choosing a path that prioritizes raw bandwidth and modern architecture over the polished, plug-and-play nature of more expensive ecosystems. Because it draws a notable amount of electricity for its performance class, the noise and heat from your cooling fans will be a constant presence during heavy sessions. It serves as a gritty, capable entry point into modern computing for those who understand that the 8.0 GB limit and the thermal output are the primary trade-offs for its launch MSRP of $179.

GeForce RTX 4080
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Product Name GeForce RTX 4080
MSRP $1,199
Release Date 2022-09-20
Manufacturer NVIDIA
Memory Size 16 GB
Memory Type GDDR6X
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 1400 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 716.8 GB/s
Base Clock 2205 MHz
Boost Clock 2505 MHz
Shading Units 9728
Ray Tracing Cores 76
TMUs 304
ROPs 112
Pixel Rate 280.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 761.5 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 48.7 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 48.7 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 761.5 GFLOPS
Architecture Ada Lovelace
Process Size 5 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 16-pin
TDP 320 W
Suggested PSU 800 W
Intel Arc A580
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A580
MSRP $179
Release Date 2023-10-10
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 1700 MHz
Boost Clock 2000 MHz
Shading Units 3072
Ray Tracing Cores 24
TMUs 192
ROPs 96
Pixel Rate 192 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 384 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 24.6 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 1.5 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin
TDP 175 W
Suggested PSU 550 W

Final Verdict

The GeForce RTX 4080 stands in a completely different tier of performance compared to the Intel Arc A580. Built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, NVIDIA utilized a much more efficient process and a massive increase in shading units to drive high fidelity visuals. With 16GB of GDDR6X memory, the 4080 handles heavy assets and complex textures that would simply overwhelm the smaller capacity found on the Intel card. The bandwidth gap alone is significant, allowing for much smoother data travel during heavy workloads or intensive rendering tasks.

Software ecosystem benefits also lean heavily toward NVIDIA here. The inclusion of DLSS 3 and advanced frame generation techniques provides a massive boost in visual fluidness without taxing the hardware as heavily as standard methods. While the Intel Arc A580 uses the Alchemist architecture and supports AV1 encoding, it remains an entry-level part meant for lighter tasks. It struggles with driver overhead in many scenarios, making it feel less reliable for a primary gaming rig. The difference in raw power is obvious when looking at the shading unit count and the dedicated hardware for lighting calculations, where NVIDIA holds a massive lead.

  • Architecture and Memory: The GeForce RTX 4080 uses 16GB of fast GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing vast overhead for professional work or high-resolution gaming. In contrast, the Intel Arc A580 settles for 8GB of GDDR6, which acts as a bottleneck for modern software that demands more VRAM for high-quality assets.
  • Efficiency and Features: NVIDIA features a sophisticated power management system. While it requires a higher wattage power supply, the performance return for every watt consumed is much greater than what Intel provides with its Xe-HPG design. The 4080 includes 76 dedicated cores for ray tracing, dwarfing the 24 found on the A580.
  • Recommendation: Buy GeForce RTX 4080 if you need a high-end card that handles ray tracing effortlessly and provides enough VRAM for professional rendering or the most demanding software.
  • Recommendation: Buy Intel Arc A580 if you have a limited launch MSRP budget and only need a basic card for simple tasks or entry-level media consumption.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.