GeForce RTX 5070 vs Intel Arc A580

Winner:
GeForce RTX 5070
Main Difference:
Modern Blackwell architecture offers massive rendering leads over the legacy budget-tier Intel Arc hardware.
Page Summary:
GeForce RTX 5070 wins by providing a generational leap in performance and modern features like DLSS 4 compared to the older Intel Arc A580, justifying its higher $549 MSRP for enthusiasts.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

GeForce RTX 5070

MSRP:
$549
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
6144
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
2325 MHz
Boost Clock:
2512 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
12.0 GB
L3 Cache:
12.0 GB
TDP:
250 W
Socket:
192 bit
Bus Width:
192 bit
Release Date:
2025-03-04
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
68.1
64
1440p
56.8
50
4K
41.6
41.6
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A580

MSRP:
$179
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3072
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1700 MHz
Boost Clock:
2000 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
175 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2023-10-10
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
24.2
24
1440p
19.5
16.2
4K
15.4
10.6
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

GeForce RTX 5070
Gaming Analysis:

The GeForce RTX 5070 is a specialized 1440p tool that hits a distinct ceiling if you try to force high-resolution output without software assistance. While it handles 1440p with ease in heavy titles, it is not a brute-force monster. The raw performance shows a visible drop as resolution climbs, moving from a smooth experience at 1080p to a heavier feel at 4K. If you are gaming on a 1440p monitor, the motion feels fluid and responsive, but once you move to a 4K display, the hardware begins to struggle unless you lean on DLSS and frame generation technologies.

The 12GB of GDDR7 memory acts as a strict guardrail for your visual settings. It provides enough breathing room for standard 1440p textures, but the 192-bit bus cannot save you from physical capacity limits when settings are pushed to the max. Modern titles using advanced engines will eat through this buffer quickly. In demanding upcoming games, you will find yourself on a tight leash with texture sliders. Pushing settings to the highest levels while enabling heavy ray tracing effects will likely cause stuttering or visible asset popping as the card reaches its 12GB limit. It is a capable mid-range buffer, but it lacks the long-term security found in cards with higher VRAM capacities.

  • 1440p Performance: This is the sweet spot where the card maintains fluidity without significant compromises to visual fidelity.
  • 4K Reality: Using this card for native 4K often results in a sluggish experience, surviving primarily through the use of multi-frame generation and AI upscaling.
  • Ray Tracing: With 48 dedicated Blackwell RT cores, standard reflections look sharp, but the silicon feels the weight of full path tracing in heavy titles.
  • The Texture Tax: 12GB of VRAM is adequate for the short term, but high-resolution texture packs in future titles will push this card toward its absolute limit.
  • Software Dependency: Performance relies heavily on the Blackwell architecture features; without upscaling, the generational leap in raw power feels modest.

Ray tracing on this hardware is competent but requires respect for its limits. While the Blackwell 2.0 architecture handles complex lighting better than previous generations, the performance remains balanced rather than dominant. You can enable reflections and shadows while keeping the experience fluid. However, turning on extreme lighting modes or full path tracing will cause performance to plummet. At that point, the card relies on its optical flow hardware to synthesize motion, which can introduce a heavier feeling in control inputs despite the visual frame count appearing high. A 750W power supply is recommended to keep this system stable under these heavy gaming loads.

Intel Arc A580
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A580 is a 1080p gaming card that serves as a competent entry point for budget builds but lacks the raw muscle to maintain fluidity at higher resolutions. While it sits on a fast 256-bit memory bus that helps it stay responsive, the Xe-HPG silicon is tuned for standard high-definition monitors. If you try to push this card to run 1440p on modern titles, you will likely encounter chugging frame rates and a loss of responsive snap during fast motion. It is a solid choice for the 1080p gamer who wants high frame rates in esports titles, but it finds its limit when you step into heavier open-world environments.

With 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, your texture budget requires careful management because that amount is becoming the floor for modern software. You can expect crisp visuals on High settings in older titles, but in newer games, you will likely need to drop textures to Medium to avoid stuttering or sudden hitches when you turn a corner in-game. The card has the bandwidth to move data quickly across its wide bus, but the memory capacity is not deep enough for the massive uncompressed texture packs common in current releases.

  • The standard rasterization performance at 1080p is its strongest suit, delivering smooth movement in Vulkan-based games where the Intel drivers are most mature.
  • Ray tracing performance is surprisingly competent for a budget card, holding its ground well thanks to 24 dedicated Ray Tracing units.
  • Using Ray Tracing at 1080p is viable if you pair it with XeSS upscaling, which helps clean up the image and recover performance lost to complex lighting calculations.
  • At 1440p, the performance drops off significantly, particularly in DirectX titles where the driver overhead still causes inconsistent frame times.
  • While the card handles reflections and shadows better than many rivals in its class, it enters slide-show territory when pushed to 4K resolutions.

You must keep the power draw in mind because this card is remarkably thirsty for the level of performance it provides. It pulls over 200W during intense gaming sessions, which is significantly more heat and electricity than some competing cards. This means your case will get warmer and your fans will likely spin louder than they would with a more efficient rival. To support this card and a standard system, a 550W power supply is a sensible minimum. It is a capable, gritty performer for the 1080p enthusiast, but the high power draw and 8GB VRAM limit mean it is a tool for the present rather than a long-term investment. Given its launch MSRP of $179, it offers a specific path into modern features for those who do not mind the trade-off in efficiency.

GeForce RTX 5070
Productivity Analysis:

While this card excels as a high-speed 1440p gaming tool, its transition to a professional workstation environment reveals a piece of hardware that functions like a surgical scalpel rather than a heavy tool for massive workloads. Production tasks that rely on accuracy and stability benefit from the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, but there is a mechanical limit when you push into high-resolution professional territory. You are choosing a refined ecosystem that prioritizes software polish over raw physical capacity. The 12GB of GDDR7 memory provides a comfortable middle ground for standard projects, keeping the system responsive when you have several creative applications open at the same time. If you try to scrub through a high-bitrate timeline loaded with complex effects, that 12GB buffer turns into a hard ceiling. You will likely see sluggish preview windows once the memory fills up because it lacks the long-term security found in cards with higher capacities. You must manage your texture pools and layer counts with a level of discipline that users working on massive projects might find restrictive.

The 192-bit bus combined with 672 GB/s of memory bandwidth makes navigating through asset-heavy scenes feel snappy. The inclusion of the NVENC encoder handles the heavy lifting of AV1 video exports, which allows you to manage high-bitrate streams without your CPU suffering a significant performance penalty. This is a clear efficiency win for single-pc setups where hardware must juggle multiple tasks at once. Stability remains a primary selling point for this hardware in a professional workspace. While other options might offer more raw memory for the money, you would lose the polished software support and specific acceleration that many professionals rely on to meet deadlines. The hardware is fast enough to handle freelance workloads at 1440p, but it remains a secondary choice for anyone building a dedicated 4K workstation or a heavy render node. To keep this system stable during long export sessions, a 700W power supply is recommended.

  • The 30.9 TFLOPS of FP16 and FP32 performance assists with AI-driven tools like generative fill or noise reduction, making these tasks feel nearly instantaneous on the specialized hardware.
  • Professional 3D rendering in applications like Blender sees a speed boost from the 48 dedicated ray tracing cores, though it stays within its mid-range tiering.
  • Support for 4:2:2 hardware decoding is a shift for video editors because it reduces the need to generate proxy files for footage from specific camera brands.
  • The 5th Gen Tensor cores allow enthusiasts to run language models with 8-bit quantization at usable speeds as long as the 12GB memory limit is respected.
  • A high-airflow case is helpful because the 250W power draw creates enough thermal density to heat up surrounding components during multi-hour render jobs.
Intel Arc A580
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A580 is defined by 1080p stability, shifting to a creative timeline introduces a different set of physical demands on the Xe-HPG architecture. Moving from short bursts of activity into a workstation role requires looking at how the silicon handles sustained data throughput during a long render or a complex 3D export. The high power draw mentioned previously carries over into productivity tasks, where the card pulls significant wattage that produces noticeable heat. You will likely hear the cooling fans working hard to keep temperatures under control when you are grinding through a project. It is a loud, functional experience that reminds you this hardware was built for raw capability rather than thermal silence.

The 8.0 GB VRAM buffer behaves as a hard border for your creative projects. If you are working on standard high-definition video projects or basic 4K cuts, the card feels responsive and manages the assets without much friction. The moment you start stacking heavy color grades or noise reduction, you might encounter significant system hitching because that memory capacity is the floor for modern professional software. However, the 256-bit memory bus provides a genuine advantage many budget contenders lack. With 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, scrubbing through the footage you can fit into memory feels strikingly snappy. It avoids the sticky lag often found on cards with narrower interfaces and moves data with the confidence of a much heavier component.

  • The hardware media engine is a primary reason to consider this card for a work build, as it offers full AV1 encoding and decoding features that are often missing from older budget hardware.
  • Intel QuickSync allows a compatible processor and this discrete card to share the workload during exports, though you must occasionally manage driver updates to ensure professional software recognizes the hardware correctly.
  • The 24 Ray Tracing cores are surprisingly functional for 3D modeling in viewport environments, holding their ground well when handling light and shadow calculations.
  • With 24.6 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, the card can serve as a budget entry point for local AI tasks or neural filters that do not exceed the onboard memory capacity.
  • Scientific simulations needing specialized precision are not the focus here, as the hardware is clearly tuned for creative media and visual tasks rather than high-level research.

Choosing this hardware for a professional environment means accepting a specific kind of ecosystem friction. You are forgoing the longstanding stability of established competitors, so you must be comfortable with the occasional driver hiccup or the need to check compatibility before updating your software. If your income depends on hitting a strict deadline every few hours, the occasional instability might be an issue. For a freelance editor on a budget or a student who needs powerful hardware encoding for video projects, the Arc A580 is a calculated choice. It provides professional-grade video tools in a package that requires a steady hand to manage the high power consumption and evolving driver landscape. Given its launch MSRP of $179, it represents a specific path into advanced media features for those who prioritize bandwidth over a larger memory pool.

GeForce RTX 5070
Feature Analysis:

A 250W typical power draw represents a substantial thermal shift for this class of hardware and requires a deliberate approach to case airflow. While the base specification suggests a 600W power supply, a 700W unit is the safer choice to handle the transient power spikes common in modern high-performance silicon. This card utilizes a single 16-pin power connector, which demands careful cable management to ensure the plug is fully seated and the wires are not under extreme tension near the socket. Given the heat density produced during long sessions, your chassis needs a consistent supply of fresh air to prevent the fans from ramping up to audible levels. This build reality means a cramped case with poor intake will likely result in higher internal temperatures for your other components.

The transition to the Blackwell 2.0 architecture brings the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface into the mid-range space, though it remains fully compatible with older PCIe 4.0 motherboards without a meaningful loss in bandwidth. You are essentially balancing a high-tech ecosystem against the physical constraints of a 192-bit memory bus. While the memory speed is high, the 12.0 GB capacity dictates how you handle visual settings in the coming years. It is a highly optimized tool for specific resolutions, provided you respect the limits of the physical memory pool. During assembly, the primarily hurdle is the 16-pin cable clearance, as these connectors require a straight path before any significant bends to maintain a reliable electrical connection.

  • Power Management: A 700W power supply provides the necessary stability to ensure the system does not shut down during sudden peaks in demand.
  • Thermal Density: The 250W TDP means the card exports significant heat into the case, making at least two front intake fans a requirement for stable operation.
  • Cable Safety: The 16-pin connection features recessed sensing pins designed to prevent power delivery if the cable is loose, so listen for a physical click during installation.
  • Memory Ceiling: The 12.0 GB of VRAM serves as a strict limit for high-resolution texture packs, which may lead to asset swapping if the buffer is overfilled.
  • System Interface: Support for PCIe 5.0 ensures the card is ready for the latest motherboard standards while maintaining efficiency on older platforms.

Memory capacity remains the most significant long-term factor to consider when planning your build around this hardware. While the current bandwidth is sufficient for fluid navigation in complex scenes, the 12.0 GB of GDDR7 acts as a firm guardrail that will eventually require you to lower texture quality in the most demanding future titles. This hardware is designed for a refined and efficient experience rather than brute-force longevity through massive memory pools. If you understand that you are buying into a specific performance tier that prioritizes modern architectural features over raw capacity, the hardware delivers a very consistent and predictable user experience. It functions best in a well-ventilated mid-tower where the power delivery and thermal output can be managed without compromising the lifespan of neighboring parts.

Intel Arc A580
Feature Analysis:

A typical 175W TDP rating suggests a mid-range thermal profile, but the physical reality of the Xe-HPG architecture is that it pushes considerable heat into your chassis during sustained use. This power demand is high for an entry-level part, meaning your case airflow needs to be active rather than passive to prevent the ambient temperature from climbing. While the official minimum specification suggests a 450W power supply, a 550W unit is the safer choice to handle the power spikes common with these Alchemist chips. Using a power supply with a bit more breathing room ensures the system remains stable when the hardware is under full load.

The 8.0 GB VRAM capacity serves as a strict boundary for your visual settings, acting as a ceiling that stays relevant throughout the life of the build. In modern titles, this amount of memory is the baseline, often requiring you to stay at 1080p and avoid the highest texture presets to maintain a smooth experience. The 256-bit bus helps move data with significant speed, yet the physical capacity is shallow enough that 1440p textures can quickly lead to stuttering. It is a build designed for the standard high-definition era, requiring a user who is comfortable managing settings rather than set-and-forget high-resolution gaming.

  • The card utilizes two standard 8-pin power connectors, which avoids the need for specialized adapters and ensures compatibility with traditional power supply cables.
  • A full PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides the maximum available bandwidth, ensuring the card does not suffer from the performance penalties sometimes found on budget hardware with fewer lanes.
  • The hardware is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, which introduced dedicated silicon for complex tasks like ray tracing and AI-enhanced upscaling.
  • Integrating this hardware into your build requires a motherboard that supports Resizable BAR, as the architecture relies heavily on this feature to function at its intended speed.
  • Early software hurdles have largely been addressed through consistent updates, though the platform still requires a more hands-on approach to driver management than established rivals.

Building with the Arc A580 means accepting a specific kind of technical friction in exchange for its unique feature set. You are choosing a path that prioritizes raw bandwidth and modern architecture over the polished, plug-and-play nature of more expensive ecosystems. Because it draws a notable amount of electricity for its performance class, the noise and heat from your cooling fans will be a constant presence during heavy sessions. It serves as a gritty, capable entry point into modern computing for those who understand that the 8.0 GB limit and the thermal output are the primary trade-offs for its launch MSRP of $179.

GeForce RTX 5070
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP $549
Release Date 2025-03-04
Chipset Manufacturer NVIDIA
Memory Size 12 GB
Memory Type GDDR7
Memory Bus 192 bit
Memory Clock 1750 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 672.0 GB/s
Base Clock 2325 MHz
Boost Clock 2512 MHz
Shading Units 6144
Ray Tracing Cores 48
TMUs 192
ROPs 80
Pixel Rate 201 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 482.3 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 30.9 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 30.9 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 482.3 GFLOPS
Architecture Blackwell 2.0
Process Size 5 nm
Interface PCIe 5.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 16-pin
TDP 250 W
Suggested PSU 700 W
Intel Arc A580
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A580
MSRP $179
Release Date 2023-10-10
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 1700 MHz
Boost Clock 2000 MHz
Shading Units 3072
Ray Tracing Cores 24
TMUs 192
ROPs 96
Pixel Rate 192 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 384 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 24.6 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 1.5 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin
TDP 175 W
Suggested PSU 550 W

Final Verdict

Choosing between these two cards involves a massive gap in technology and performance. The GeForce RTX 5070 entered the market at a $549 MSRP and brought the Blackwell architecture to the mainstream, radically outpacing the older Intel Arc A580 that holds a much lower $179 MSRP. While the Intel part serves those strictly focused on getting a system running, it cannot compete with the sheer power and feature set found in the NVIDIA hardware. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built for high fidelity and heavy workloads, utilizing 12GB of fast GDDR7 memory that helps load massive assets much faster than the older GDDR6 standard found elsewhere.

  • Performance Scaling: The GeForce RTX 5070 offers a clear lead in complex rendering tasks, providing nearly triple the effective speed for modern visuals compared to the Intel Arc A580.
  • Technology and Features: With dedicated hardware for ray tracing and the inclusion of DLSS 4, the NVIDIA card handles lighting and frame generation with much better efficiency while the Intel card relies on older driver stacks.
  • Platform Requirements: The GeForce RTX 5070 utilizes a modern 16-pin power connector and significantly higher memory bandwidth, which matches its more demanding $549 MSRP at launch.

Buy GeForce RTX 5070 if you want a premium experience with the latest frame generation features and enough VRAM to handle demanding textures for years to come. Buy Intel Arc A580 if you are working with a very limited $179 MSRP budget and only need basic entry-level performance for less demanding software and older titles.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.