Radeon RX 7600 vs Intel Arc A750

Winner:
Intel Arc A750
Main Difference:
Higher memory bandwidth via a wider bus and better ray tracing capability
Page Summary:
Intel Arc A750 takes the top spot because its massive memory bandwidth and superior architectural features provide a better experience in modern games, particularly when ray tracing is involved, even though it requires significantly more power and a modern motherboard to function correctly.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP:
$199
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
2048
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1720 MHz
Boost Clock:
2655 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
165 W
Socket:
128 bit
Bus Width:
128 bit
Release Date:
2023-05-24
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
26.7
18.6
1440p
19.5
11.7
4K
9
9
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A750

MSRP:
$269
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3584
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
2050 MHz
Boost Clock:
2400 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
225 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2022-10-12
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
25.8
25
1440p
21.6
19.1
4K
15.9
12.1
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

Radeon RX 7600
Gaming Analysis:

The Radeon RX 7600 is a dedicated 1080p graphics card that hits a performance wall if you try to push it into higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, it offers a smooth experience in most modern titles and maintains high frame rates in fast-paced shooters where speed is the priority. However, the performance drop at 1440p is steep. Stepping up to a larger monitor turns fluid movement into a struggle because the hardware lacks the raw muscle to fill those extra pixels. This is a compact tool built for a specific job that ends at standard high-definition gaming.

The 8GB VRAM buffer is the most distinct limitation you will face as games grow more complex. In modern, heavy titles, this 8GB ceiling acts as a throttle. If you crank the texture settings too high, the video memory will overflow, resulting in stuttering and blurry textures that fail to load properly. You are on a strict texture budget with this card. To keep the gameplay from feeling jittery, you must be disciplined with your settings and often choose medium or high presets to stay within the narrow limits of the hardware.

  • Native 1080p performance is reliable and provides a crisp experience in dense open-world titles on optimized settings.
  • The 128-bit memory bus acts as a narrow highway that penalizes 1440p and 4K attempts, leading to frame times that feel inconsistent.
  • Ray tracing is technically supported by the 32 Ray Accelerators, but lighting effects often tank the fluidity of the game and are best left disabled for a smoother experience.
  • The RDNA 3 architecture includes dedicated media engines that help with video encoding tasks without dragging down your general system performance.
  • With a modest power draw, this card runs cool in most dual-fan configurations and fits easily into smaller cases without generating excessive heat.
  • A 550W power supply is generally sufficient to handle this card alongside a standard desktop processor.

Standard rasterization is where this card finds its footing, but it relies on FSR upscaling to maintain stability in the most demanding scenarios. While the RDNA 3 architecture brings efficiency gains over previous generations, it does not provide enough headroom to ignore the settings menu. This card is built for the present rather than aging into the next several years of high-end gaming. It is a functional, budget-conscious choice at its $199 MSRP for those sticking to 1080p monitors, though it requires compromise when the visual load gets heavy.

Intel Arc A750
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A750 is built for steady performance at 1080p, and while it relies on the older Xe-HPG architecture, it handles standard resolutions with surprising competence. You can expect a fluid experience in a wide variety of titles if you keep your expectations targeted toward a standard display setup. While the hardware can stretch into higher resolutions, it lacks the raw headroom to remain consistently smooth as the pixel count climbs, often leads to a heavy performance trade-off in demanding scenes.

With 8GB of GDDR6 memory, you are working within a clear ceiling for texture quality. In modern titles that push high memory demands, this capacity serves as a bottleneck that prevents you from maxing out every visual slider. Trying to load massive texture packs or ultra-level assets may lead to stuttering or visible hitches when the card runs out of room. The 256-bit bus width is wide for a card at its launch MSRP of $269, which helps data move quickly through the pipeline, but the 8GB limit remains the final decider for your settings.

The hardware includes 28 ray tracing cores, but enabling these effects usually comes with a massive cost to stability. Because these are first-generation cores, they often struggle with the heavy math required for complex lighting or sharp reflections. Toggling these features on can quickly turn a fluid game into a choppy experience. If you decide to use these effects, you will need to rely on Intel XeSS upscaling to regain a playable feel. Without that AI-assisted help, native ray tracing performance is generally too heavy for most AAA games, making standard rasterized settings the better path for a stable experience.

  • 1080p Gaming: A reliable and fluid choice for high settings in most titles.
  • 1440p Gaming: Performance is inconsistent and typically requires dropping to medium settings to stay smooth.
  • 4K Gaming: The hardware lacks the resources for a playable experience at this resolution.
  • Texture Quality: Capped by the 8GB ceiling, requiring more conservative choices in memory-heavy releases.
  • Lighting Effects: Ray tracing is present but functions mostly as an enthusiast experiment due to the steep performance tax.
Radeon RX 7600
Productivity Analysis:

While the hardware is efficient for gaming at standard resolutions, shifting to professional workloads reveals a specific set of boundaries defined by the physical memory capacity. This card is a functional entry point for creative tasks, but the moment you move into high-resolution video timelines or complex rendering, the 8GB buffer becomes a hard ceiling. It is much like having a powerful engine that can only carry a small amount of luggage. The RDNA 3 architecture provides the raw compute performance necessary for heavy calculations, but that power is often left waiting for memory space when you attempt to load large textures or high-bitrate video files.

The 8GB VRAM limit is the primary point of friction for anyone attempting to use this card for professional content creation. In modern video editing, especially when working with 4K footage or applying several layers of color correction, that capacity is a strict limit rather than a suggestion. You will likely encounter sluggish interface response or application slowdowns if your project moves beyond a simple social media edit. Professional tasks frequently benefit from larger memory pools that allow for more assets to be stored locally on the card. Utilizing this hardware for work requires a disciplined approach where you focus on a single application at a time to prevent the system from falling back on slower system memory.

  • The 288 GB/s memory bandwidth allows for responsive manipulation of smaller assets, though the 128-bit bus can feel like a bottleneck when navigating through massive high-resolution RAW files.
  • Hardware AV1 encoding support is a significant advantage for those who need to broadcast high-quality video streams without putting a heavy load on the processor during a live session.
  • High FP16 compute performance helps accelerate AI-driven tools in various creative suites, which handles localized noise reduction and automated subject selection far faster than older architectures.
  • The 32 Ray Tracing cores are available for previewing lighting and shadows in 3D scenes, though they are most effective for real-time feedback rather than the final production phase of a heavy project.
  • With a 165W power draw, the card is physically easy to integrate into a workspace and maintains stable temperatures during long video export sessions in many dual-fan configurations.

Time is the currency of any professional environment and the RX 7600 requires more of it than a dedicated flagship workstation tool would. While the AV1 encoder provides modern standards for broadcasting, the lack of VRAM headroom means you are often negotiating with the software to stay within safe operating limits. It is a practical choice for a student or a hobbyist who is learning the ropes, but it lacks the massive memory buffer required for mission-critical deadlines involving complex 3D geometry. You are choosing raw compute value over long-term memory stability. If your work involves 10-bit video or dense artistic scenes, you will find yourself checking the system resources frequently to ensure the hardware can keep up with your ambition.

Intel Arc A750
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A750 translates well to standard displays, moving into a professional workload highlights the specific strengths and physical limitations of the Xe-HPG architecture. You are shifting from a hobbyist environment to one where driver stability and software compatibility dictate your daily pace. It is a capable tool for entry-level creators who need high-speed data paths, but it requires a disciplined approach to asset management to avoid hitting the hardware's fixed hardware ceilings. You cannot treat a mid-tier card like a dedicated workstation flagship and expect it to handle massive, unoptimized projects without friction.

The 8GB VRAM buffer acts as a hard boundary for anyone working in 3D rendering or high-resolution video production. Attempting to edit a dense 4K timeline with multiple layers of color grading and complex effects can lead to significant slowdowns when the memory fills up. Professional rendering in applications like Blender often requires the entire scene to fit within this video memory, so 8GB does not provide much headroom for complex geometry or oversized textures. When your project exceeds this limit, the system must swap data to the slower system RAM, causing the creative process to lose its snappy feel. Large, high-density scenes are generally out of reach for this specific memory configuration.

The 256-bit bus width and 512 GB/s memory bandwidth are the standout technical features that help the card punch above its weight in specific tasks. When you are scrubbing through raw footage, this wide highway for data movement prevents the stuttering playback that often affects other cards in this tier. The inclusion of dedicated AV1 encoding is a practical advantage for modern streamers and video editors who need fast exports without relying entirely on the CPU. However, choosing this hardware means stepping away from the established CUDA ecosystem which remains a standard for many professional suites. You gain impressive raw compute through the 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, but you might spend more time managing software updates or ensuring your specific apps are fully optimized for Intel silicon.

  • Video Editing: The high memory bandwidth ensures responsive timeline scrubbing, though the 8GB buffer limits the complexity of 4K effects.
  • 3D Rendering: The 28 ray tracing cores assist with viewport interactivity, but the lack of traditional industry-standard software hooks may require extra configuration.
  • Encoding Power: The built-in AV1 encoder provides a modern solution for high-quality exports and efficient streaming workflows.
  • Computational Tasks: Strong raw compute figures handle standard rendering and AI-assisted image tools with competitive speed.
  • System Requirements: A 650W power supply is the recommended starting point to ensure the system remains stable under heavy sustained rendering loads.
Radeon RX 7600
Feature Analysis:

The Radeon RX 7600 operates on a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface which carries specific implications for those installing it into older machines. While the card is designed for modern standards, using it on a motherboard that only supports PCIe 3.0 effectively cuts the available communication bandwidth in half because of the reduced lane count. This physical limitation rarely shows up in theoretical tests but it can manifest as inconsistent frame delivery in games that frequently cycle large data sets between the system memory and the 8GB buffer. It is a hardware reality that makes the card most reliable when paired with a processor and motherboard that also support the PCIe 4.0 standard or newer.

Stability under load depends on providing a bit more breathing room than the bare minimum requirements might suggest. While the official data points to a 165W power draw, pairing this card with a 550W power supply ensures the system remains stable during the quick energy spikes that occur as scenes shift from simple menus to complex action. The physical installation is remarkably simple because the card uses a single standard 8-pin connector. You will not need to worry about the specialized high-power adapters or the careful cable bending required by some flagship alternatives, making it a predictable fit for existing mid-tower cases and standard cable kits.

  • The 8GB VRAM capacity represents a hard ceiling for texture quality and will likely require you to stay on medium or high presets to avoid data overflow in modern titles.
  • Heat management is generally a non-issue as the modest 165W envelope is easily handled by standard dual-fan cooling designs without requiring aggressive fan curves.
  • Standard 8-pin power delivery means you can use the cables already attached to your power supply without searching for modern ATX 3.0 adapters or converters.
  • The RDNA 3 architecture provides a generational efficiency boost that helps the card maintain stable clock speeds even when the visual complexity of a game increases rapidly.
  • Integration into compact builds is often easier with this model because the low heat output puts less thermal pressure on the other components inside a small chassis.

Choosing this hardware means accepting a specific performance profile that is very much tied to its 128-bit memory bus. That narrow bus acts as a constraint that tethers the card to standard resolutions where the data flow can remain steady and predictable. It offers a functional entry point for those who value a straightforward build process and low power consumption over extreme future-proofing. At the $199 MSRP, the RX 7600 is a specialized 1080p solution that focuses on providing a reliable experience today while acknowledging that its memory configuration will eventually require more aggressive settings management as software continues to evolve.

Intel Arc A750
Feature Analysis:

The 225W power draw stands out as the primary logistical hurdle for a build centered on the Intel Arc A750, as this hardware pulls more electricity than typically expected in this performance tier. While the base technical specification suggests a 550W power supply, you should pair this card with a 650W unit to accommodate the abrupt power spikes that occur during intensive gaming or complex rendering tasks. Providing this extra room ensures that your system does not shut down unexpectedly when the silicon demands a momentary surge of current. Because the card utilizes a standard combination of one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, you can rely on traditional power cables without the need for specialized adapters or the specific clearance requirements of modern high-wattage headers. This straightforward physical installation makes the card compatible with a wide variety of existing cases and legacy power supplies that haven't been updated for the newest standards.

The 8GB VRAM capacity represents a fixed ceiling that dictates your long-term resolution and texture settings regardless of other internal hardware strengths. While the 256-bit memory bus facilitates a high rate of data transfer, the physical volume of memory is small enough that high-resolution texture packs can quickly saturate the buffer. If you push the software beyond this 8GB limit, you are likely to encounter stuttering as the system struggles to manage data overflow between the card and the rest of your PC. It is a build reality that requires a more disciplined approach to settings, where choosing slightly lower presets often yields a much more stable and consistent experience than chasing visual extremes that the hardware cannot technically sustain over time.

Platform compatibility serves as the final non-negotiable requirement because the Xe-HPG architecture relies heavily on Resizable BAR to function at its intended level of performance. You must verify that your motherboard and processor support this feature, as failing to enable it in the BIOS will lead to a significant and noticeable loss in frame consistency and overall speed. This technical dependency makes the card a poor fit for older systems from the pre-2020 era that lack the necessary firmware support. While driver consistency has improved significantly since the initial launch of the platform, the Arc A750 still appeals most to the type of user who enjoys checking for software updates and fine-tuning system configurations to maximize hardware potential.

  • Power Management: The 225W TDP requires a 650W power supply to ensure stability against power fluctuations during heavy use.
  • Memory Boundaries: The 8GB VRAM limit makes 1080p the ideal target resolution to avoid stuttering caused by over-saturated video memory.
  • Cable Setup: Standard 6-pin and 8-pin power connectors provide broad compatibility with existing ATX power supplies.
  • Platform Connectivity: The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a full-speed data path, though the hardware effectively mandates Resizable BAR support.
  • Software Commitment: Optimal results require frequent driver updates and a motherboard BIOS modern enough to support current communication standards.
Radeon RX 7600
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Model Radeon RX 7600
MSRP $199
Release Date 2023-05-24
Manufacturer AMD
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 128 bit
Memory Clock 2250 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 288.0 GB/s
Base Clock 1720 MHz
Boost Clock 2655 MHz
Shading Units 2048
Ray Tracing Cores 32
TMUs 128
ROPs 64
Pixel Rate 169.9 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 339.8 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 43.5 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 679.7 GFLOPS
Architecture RDNA 3.0
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x8
Power Connectors 1x 8-pin
TDP 165 W
Suggested PSU 550 W
Intel Arc A750
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A750
MSRP $269
Release Date 2022-10-12
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 2050 MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz
Shading Units 3584
Ray Tracing Cores 28
TMUs 224
ROPs 112
Pixel Rate 268.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 537.6 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 34.4 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 17.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 2.2 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
TDP 225 W
Suggested PSU 650 W

Final Verdict

Choosing between these two cards requires looking at the raw hardware specs rather than just the brand name. The Intel Arc A750 features a 256-bit memory bus that allows for 512 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a massive jump over the 128-bit bus found on the Radeon RX 7600. High bandwidth helps load textures fast and keeps the frame delivery smooth when modern titles start pushing heavy assets. Even at the $269 MSRP at launch, this hardware advantage makes a noticeable difference in how games feel. The Intel architecture handles ray tracing calculations with much more grace than the AMD alternative. While the Radeon RX 7600 has a lower $199 MSRP at launch and draws less power, it often finds itself bottlenecked by its narrow bus. This limitation can cause stuttering if the game engine demands rapid data transfer between the VRAM and the processor. Intellectual consistency requires pointing out that the Arc A750 is not a simple plug-and-play solution for every builder. It demands a beefy power supply and a motherboard that supports Resizable BAR. Without those features, performance drops off a cliff. The Radeon RX 7600 is much more forgiving for users with older hardware or smaller power units. It runs cool and stays stable without much fussing in settings menus. However, once you factor in the creative performance gains from that wider bus, the Intel card pulls ahead for serious users. You get better support for complex effects and a much stronger ceiling for architectural headroom. It feels like a more substantial piece of silicon for a slightly higher initial investment.

  • Gaming Performance: Intel Arc A750 provides a clear lead in titles that utilize heavy ray tracing or high-resolution textures due to its superior memory interface.
  • Productivity: Both cards include hardware for AV1 encoding, but the higher bandwidth on the Intel side makes scrubbing through video timelines and applying filters much more responsive.
  • Platform Requirements: Radeon RX 7600 is easier to drop into older systems, while the Intel Arc A750 strictly requires modern motherboard features and more robust power delivery.
  • Buy Intel Arc A750 if you prioritize ray tracing performance and memory bandwidth.
  • Buy Radeon RX 7600 if you need lower power consumption and better driver stability on older platforms.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.