Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Intel Arc A750

Winner:
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Main Difference:
Double the memory and significantly higher raw processing power for high fidelity visuals.
Page Summary:
Radeon RX 7800 XT wins due to its massive VRAM advantage and superior efficiency, whereas the Intel Arc A750 serves as a basic entry option for those on a tighter budget who do not mind lower performance limits.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

Radeon RX 7800 XT

MSRP:
$499
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3840
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1295 MHz
Boost Clock:
2430 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
16.0 GB
L3 Cache:
16.0 GB
TDP:
263 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2023-08-25
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
56.9
46
1440p
48.3
35.7
4K
30.2
30.2
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A750

MSRP:
$269
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3584
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
2050 MHz
Boost Clock:
2400 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
225 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2022-10-12
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
25.8
25
1440p
21.6
19.1
4K
15.9
12.1
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

Radeon RX 7800 XT
Gaming Analysis:

The Radeon RX 7800 XT functions as a high-tier option for enthusiasts focusing on 1440p performance. It relies on sheer bandwidth and a large memory pool to handle demanding textures, though you will likely see the hardware struggle at 4K unless you use upscaling to stabilize the experience. The performance profile favors traditional rendering where the card can push high frame rates with ease, but the experience becomes more of a struggle when you enable intensive ray-tracing effects that tax the RDNA 3.0 architecture.

  • The 16GB GDDR6 VRAM buffer is a significant advantage for long-term use. As modern titles demand more memory for high-resolution assets, this card provides enough overhead to keep texture settings high without the stuttering common on cards with smaller memory banks. It allows you to push the visual quality of world details without hitting a sudden wall that causes inconsistent frame delivery.
  • Rasterization is the clear strength of this card. At 1440p, it delivers fluid performance in competitive titles and heavy AAA releases alike, often showing a raw speed advantage over competitors like the RTX 4070. At lower resolutions, you might even find your processor becomes the bottleneck because the GPU handles standard rendering tasks so quickly.
  • Ray tracing remains a demanding task for this hardware. Even with 60 dedicated cores, heavy lighting implementations can cause a major drop in fluidity. For titles with complex path tracing or global illumination, you may need to keep these settings at more modest levels to maintain a smooth experience without the game becoming choppy.
  • Upscaling via FSR is an important tool if you want to attempt 4K gaming. Running at 4K native often results in lower responsiveness that is hard to ignore in fast-paced scenes. Using quality-focused upscaling modes helps maintain visual clarity while bringing the performance back into a playable range.
  • Power requirements are notable for this model. Considering the boost clock speeds and the architecture, a 750W power supply is recommended to handle the hardware during heavy gaming loads. The design focuses on raw memory bandwidth and traditional speed rather than maximum power efficiency, so expect the card to generate a fair amount of heat during long sessions.
Intel Arc A750
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A750 is built for steady performance at 1080p, and while it relies on the older Xe-HPG architecture, it handles standard resolutions with surprising competence. You can expect a fluid experience in a wide variety of titles if you keep your expectations targeted toward a standard display setup. While the hardware can stretch into higher resolutions, it lacks the raw headroom to remain consistently smooth as the pixel count climbs, often leads to a heavy performance trade-off in demanding scenes.

With 8GB of GDDR6 memory, you are working within a clear ceiling for texture quality. In modern titles that push high memory demands, this capacity serves as a bottleneck that prevents you from maxing out every visual slider. Trying to load massive texture packs or ultra-level assets may lead to stuttering or visible hitches when the card runs out of room. The 256-bit bus width is wide for a card at its launch MSRP of $269, which helps data move quickly through the pipeline, but the 8GB limit remains the final decider for your settings.

The hardware includes 28 ray tracing cores, but enabling these effects usually comes with a massive cost to stability. Because these are first-generation cores, they often struggle with the heavy math required for complex lighting or sharp reflections. Toggling these features on can quickly turn a fluid game into a choppy experience. If you decide to use these effects, you will need to rely on Intel XeSS upscaling to regain a playable feel. Without that AI-assisted help, native ray tracing performance is generally too heavy for most AAA games, making standard rasterized settings the better path for a stable experience.

  • 1080p Gaming: A reliable and fluid choice for high settings in most titles.
  • 1440p Gaming: Performance is inconsistent and typically requires dropping to medium settings to stay smooth.
  • 4K Gaming: The hardware lacks the resources for a playable experience at this resolution.
  • Texture Quality: Capped by the 8GB ceiling, requiring more conservative choices in memory-heavy releases.
  • Lighting Effects: Ray tracing is present but functions mostly as an enthusiast experiment due to the steep performance tax.
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Productivity Analysis:

While the hardware is designed to excel in high-resolution gaming, the transition into a professional workstation environment reveals a card defined by raw memory capacity rather than specialized software optimization. You are looking at a component that trades the heavy industry polish of competing ecosystems for sheer silicon volume. If you intend to use this for creative work, the decision rests on whether the 16GB memory buffer outweighs the lack of specialized acceleration found in certain proprietary production pipelines. It serves as a heavy lifting tool for texture-heavy projects even as it finds less footing in certain specialized rendering tasks that rely on deep software integration or specific proprietary standards. Using this card for the right creative job makes it a functional workhorse, whereas forcing it into a workflow locked to specific third-party proprietary standards might leave you wishing for more specialized driver support.

  • The 16GB VRAM capacity acts as a significant buffer against memory limitations that can stall productivity on cards with smaller pools. While lower memory counts can create a hard wall for high-resolution video timelines or complex 3D scenes, this 256-bit bus allows you to load substantial assets without the system stuttering under the weight of the project. It provides a level of breathing room that allows for running multiple intensive creative applications simultaneously without hitting sudden performance drops when a project expands in complexity.
  • A memory bandwidth of over 620 GB/s ensures that data moves quickly enough to keep the user experience feeling responsive during active editing. You can feel this speed when scrubbing through a high-bitrate video timeline or manipulating large texture files because the hardware does not struggle to feed the processing cores during heavy data ingestion. This high-speed data highway provides a tactile precision that is often absent on cards with narrower buses which can feel sluggish when handled under heavy production loads.
  • The software ecosystem requires an understanding of the trade-offs involved when moving away from industry-standard proprietary rendering paths. In applications like Blender, the 60 ray tracing cores provide hardware-level acceleration, yet you may find that software specifically tuned for the competition still completes complex renders with more efficiency. You are essentially choosing a path of raw hardware value over the highly refined professional support and specialized stability offered by competing architectures that have dominated the professional space for years.
  • Local AI acceleration is handled through the FP16 compute performance which serves as the engine for modern tools like generative image generation or neural engine noise reduction. While the card does not utilize the same specialized tensor hardware as some competitors, it remains a capable local accelerator for many open-source models and creative suites. This provides enough power to experiment with and ship complex projects involving modern machine learning tools even if the card is not a dedicated enterprise AI solution.
  • The media engine includes hardware support for AV1 encoding which has become a vital standard for modern archival and high-quality video delivery. Creators can produce high-quality exports without the massive processing penalty that historically affected older architectures, keeping the rest of the system responsive while a video finishes in the background. A 750W power supply is recommended to maintain stability when the card is pushed to its limits during these long rendering or encoding sessions.
Intel Arc A750
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A750 translates well to standard displays, moving into a professional workload highlights the specific strengths and physical limitations of the Xe-HPG architecture. You are shifting from a hobbyist environment to one where driver stability and software compatibility dictate your daily pace. It is a capable tool for entry-level creators who need high-speed data paths, but it requires a disciplined approach to asset management to avoid hitting the hardware's fixed hardware ceilings. You cannot treat a mid-tier card like a dedicated workstation flagship and expect it to handle massive, unoptimized projects without friction.

The 8GB VRAM buffer acts as a hard boundary for anyone working in 3D rendering or high-resolution video production. Attempting to edit a dense 4K timeline with multiple layers of color grading and complex effects can lead to significant slowdowns when the memory fills up. Professional rendering in applications like Blender often requires the entire scene to fit within this video memory, so 8GB does not provide much headroom for complex geometry or oversized textures. When your project exceeds this limit, the system must swap data to the slower system RAM, causing the creative process to lose its snappy feel. Large, high-density scenes are generally out of reach for this specific memory configuration.

The 256-bit bus width and 512 GB/s memory bandwidth are the standout technical features that help the card punch above its weight in specific tasks. When you are scrubbing through raw footage, this wide highway for data movement prevents the stuttering playback that often affects other cards in this tier. The inclusion of dedicated AV1 encoding is a practical advantage for modern streamers and video editors who need fast exports without relying entirely on the CPU. However, choosing this hardware means stepping away from the established CUDA ecosystem which remains a standard for many professional suites. You gain impressive raw compute through the 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, but you might spend more time managing software updates or ensuring your specific apps are fully optimized for Intel silicon.

  • Video Editing: The high memory bandwidth ensures responsive timeline scrubbing, though the 8GB buffer limits the complexity of 4K effects.
  • 3D Rendering: The 28 ray tracing cores assist with viewport interactivity, but the lack of traditional industry-standard software hooks may require extra configuration.
  • Encoding Power: The built-in AV1 encoder provides a modern solution for high-quality exports and efficient streaming workflows.
  • Computational Tasks: Strong raw compute figures handle standard rendering and AI-assisted image tools with competitive speed.
  • System Requirements: A 650W power supply is the recommended starting point to ensure the system remains stable under heavy sustained rendering loads.
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Feature Analysis:

A typical 263 W power draw means this hardware generates substantial heat that your case fans must exhaust to prevent internal temperatures from climbing during long gaming sessions. Relying on two standard 8-pin PCIe cables, the card avoids the stiffness and cable management complexity often associated with newer 16-pin power standards found on high-end competitors. This physical layout makes the installation process significantly more intuitive for builders using older but reliable power supplies that lack specialized connectors. While the 600 W minimum specification is technically functional, moving to a 750W power supply provides the necessary electrical headroom to absorb the sudden power spikes that occur when the architecture transitions from idle to full load. This extra capacity ensures the system remains stable and prevents the sudden shutdowns that can happen when a power supply is pushed too close to its theoretical limit by a hungry GPU and a modern processor working in tandem.

  • The 16.0 GB VRAM buffer behaves like long-term insurance for your build because it prevents the stuttering and texture pop-in that can occur when 1440p assets exceed the capacity of smaller memory banks.
  • A PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures you are utilizing the full bandwidth available from your motherboard which is particularly helpful if you are installing this into a system with an older PCIe 3.0 slot.
  • The RDNA 3.0 architecture focuses on traditional rendering speed rather than proprietary software hacks, making it a straightforward choice for those who prefer consistent frames over experimental lighting features.
  • While the physical mounting is simple, the card occupies considerable space in the chassis and requires plenty of unobstructed airflow to maintain its boost clock speeds without the fans needing to spin at distracting volumes.
  • The launch MSRP of $499 established this card as a high-value contender for builders who prioritize raw memory capacity and 256-bit bus width over the specialized AI features found in other ecosystems.
Intel Arc A750
Feature Analysis:

The 225W power draw stands out as the primary logistical hurdle for a build centered on the Intel Arc A750, as this hardware pulls more electricity than typically expected in this performance tier. While the base technical specification suggests a 550W power supply, you should pair this card with a 650W unit to accommodate the abrupt power spikes that occur during intensive gaming or complex rendering tasks. Providing this extra room ensures that your system does not shut down unexpectedly when the silicon demands a momentary surge of current. Because the card utilizes a standard combination of one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, you can rely on traditional power cables without the need for specialized adapters or the specific clearance requirements of modern high-wattage headers. This straightforward physical installation makes the card compatible with a wide variety of existing cases and legacy power supplies that haven't been updated for the newest standards.

The 8GB VRAM capacity represents a fixed ceiling that dictates your long-term resolution and texture settings regardless of other internal hardware strengths. While the 256-bit memory bus facilitates a high rate of data transfer, the physical volume of memory is small enough that high-resolution texture packs can quickly saturate the buffer. If you push the software beyond this 8GB limit, you are likely to encounter stuttering as the system struggles to manage data overflow between the card and the rest of your PC. It is a build reality that requires a more disciplined approach to settings, where choosing slightly lower presets often yields a much more stable and consistent experience than chasing visual extremes that the hardware cannot technically sustain over time.

Platform compatibility serves as the final non-negotiable requirement because the Xe-HPG architecture relies heavily on Resizable BAR to function at its intended level of performance. You must verify that your motherboard and processor support this feature, as failing to enable it in the BIOS will lead to a significant and noticeable loss in frame consistency and overall speed. This technical dependency makes the card a poor fit for older systems from the pre-2020 era that lack the necessary firmware support. While driver consistency has improved significantly since the initial launch of the platform, the Arc A750 still appeals most to the type of user who enjoys checking for software updates and fine-tuning system configurations to maximize hardware potential.

  • Power Management: The 225W TDP requires a 650W power supply to ensure stability against power fluctuations during heavy use.
  • Memory Boundaries: The 8GB VRAM limit makes 1080p the ideal target resolution to avoid stuttering caused by over-saturated video memory.
  • Cable Setup: Standard 6-pin and 8-pin power connectors provide broad compatibility with existing ATX power supplies.
  • Platform Connectivity: The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a full-speed data path, though the hardware effectively mandates Resizable BAR support.
  • Software Commitment: Optimal results require frequent driver updates and a motherboard BIOS modern enough to support current communication standards.
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Model Name Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP $499
Release Date 2023-08-25
Chipset Manufacturer AMD
Memory Size 16 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2438 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 624.1 GB/s
Base Clock 1295 MHz
Boost Clock 2430 MHz
Shading Units 3840
Ray Tracing Cores 60
TMUs 240
ROPs 96
Pixel Rate 233.3 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 583.2 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 74.7 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 37.3 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 1.2 TFLOPS
Architecture RDNA 3.0
Process Size 5 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin
TDP 263 W
Suggested PSU 700 W
Intel Arc A750
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A750
MSRP $269
Release Date 2022-10-12
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 2050 MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz
Shading Units 3584
Ray Tracing Cores 28
TMUs 224
ROPs 112
Pixel Rate 268.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 537.6 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 34.4 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 17.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 2.2 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
TDP 225 W
Suggested PSU 650 W

Final Verdict

The Radeon RX 7800 XT represents a massive leap in capability over the Intel Arc A750 because it provides the memory headroom and raw horsepower needed for modern gaming at higher fidelity. With a $499 MSRP at launch, this card offers 16GB of GDDR6 memory, which is double what the Intel card provides. This extra memory is not just a marketing number. It prevents the nasty stuttering and texture pop-in that occurs when a card runs out of space while trying to load large game worlds or detailed artistic assets. The RDNA 3 architecture also brings much better power efficiency and a clear lead in raw rasterization tasks.

By comparison, the Intel Arc A750 arrived with a $269 MSRP and targets a much different user. While it was a bold first step for Intel, the 8GB buffer creates a hard ceiling that limits how long the card will remain relevant as software becomes more demanding. It lacks the memory bandwidth and shading units to keep up with the Radeon card in heavy workloads. Testing shows that while the Intel card is a functional entry-point, the Radeon RX 7800 XT is roughly twice as fast in many scenarios, making it the superior long-term investment for a stable system. The Radeon also features more mature drivers and better overall hardware compatibility across various PC builds.

  • Buy Radeon RX 7800 XT if you want high frame rates at demanding settings and need enough VRAM to handle future software updates without hitting a performance wall.
  • Buy Intel Arc A750 if your budget is strictly limited to the $269 MSRP range and you are comfortable with lower settings and a smaller memory capacity.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.