Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs Intel Arc A750

Winner:
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Main Difference:
Double the memory capacity and significantly higher raw compute throughput for intensive tasks.
Page Summary:
Radeon RX 7900 GRE offers double the memory and vastly superior rendering speed compared to the Intel Arc A750.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

Radeon RX 7900 GRE

MSRP:
$549
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
5120
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1287 MHz
Boost Clock:
2245 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
16.0 GB
L3 Cache:
16.0 GB
TDP:
260 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2023-07-27
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
62.5
51.5
1440p
54.2
40.4
4K
32.5
32.5
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A750

MSRP:
$269
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3584
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
2050 MHz
Boost Clock:
2400 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
225 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2022-10-12
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
25.8
25
1440p
21.6
19.1
4K
15.9
12.1
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Gaming Analysis:

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a high-performance contender that fits into the upper-tier of gaming hardware, offering a massive leap over entry-level parts. Built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, it provides enough raw power to handle extremely high visual settings at 1440p and can stretch into higher resolutions if you manage your expectations regarding total frame output. It behaves as a balanced middle ground in the lineup, delivering smooth motion in standard gaming without the heat or power demands found in the heaviest flagship silicon.

The 16GB GDDR6 memory buffer is a practical advantage for modern gaming. Many modern titles are increasingly hungry for video memory, and this 16GB ceiling allows you to keep texture quality at maximum without the stuttering or blurry asset loading that can happen on cards with less capacity. This buffer provides significant longevity against the demanding requirements of visual-heavy console ports and complex open-world environments.

  • Standard Gaming (Rasterization): This is where the card is most comfortable. It produces fluid movement across almost any modern title at 1440p. While it can handle 4K, the 256-bit memory bus means performance might tighten in extremely dense scenes compared to larger enthusiast cards.
  • Ray Tracing Performance: With 80 Ray Accelerators, the hardware can handle ray-traced lighting effects, though it remains more demanding than standard rendering. In titles with lighter ray tracing implementations, the visuals remain sharp and playable, but for heavy lighting loads, you will likely need to engage upscaling tools to maintain a steady feel.
  • Upscaling and Frame Generation: You have access to FSR 3 and driver-level Fluid Motion Frames. These features are great for bridging the gap during heavy 4K workloads or when you want the highest possible visual fluidity in fast-paced titles.
  • Memory Tuning: One interesting trait of this card is the ability to adjust memory timings through software. For those comfortable with basic tuning, there is room to tighten up performance and gain a small edge in responsiveness.

The 750W power supply recommendation ensures the card has plenty of headroom for its 2245 MHz boost clock during intense gaming sessions. It is a sensible choice for a build centered on high fidelity and a generous memory overhead, offering a path to enthusiast-level gaming without demanding a specialized high-wattage power environment or a massive chassis. At a launch MSRP of $549, it represents a sturdy investment for high-refresh 1440p setups.

Intel Arc A750
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A750 is built for steady performance at 1080p, and while it relies on the older Xe-HPG architecture, it handles standard resolutions with surprising competence. You can expect a fluid experience in a wide variety of titles if you keep your expectations targeted toward a standard display setup. While the hardware can stretch into higher resolutions, it lacks the raw headroom to remain consistently smooth as the pixel count climbs, often leads to a heavy performance trade-off in demanding scenes.

With 8GB of GDDR6 memory, you are working within a clear ceiling for texture quality. In modern titles that push high memory demands, this capacity serves as a bottleneck that prevents you from maxing out every visual slider. Trying to load massive texture packs or ultra-level assets may lead to stuttering or visible hitches when the card runs out of room. The 256-bit bus width is wide for a card at its launch MSRP of $269, which helps data move quickly through the pipeline, but the 8GB limit remains the final decider for your settings.

The hardware includes 28 ray tracing cores, but enabling these effects usually comes with a massive cost to stability. Because these are first-generation cores, they often struggle with the heavy math required for complex lighting or sharp reflections. Toggling these features on can quickly turn a fluid game into a choppy experience. If you decide to use these effects, you will need to rely on Intel XeSS upscaling to regain a playable feel. Without that AI-assisted help, native ray tracing performance is generally too heavy for most AAA games, making standard rasterized settings the better path for a stable experience.

  • 1080p Gaming: A reliable and fluid choice for high settings in most titles.
  • 1440p Gaming: Performance is inconsistent and typically requires dropping to medium settings to stay smooth.
  • 4K Gaming: The hardware lacks the resources for a playable experience at this resolution.
  • Texture Quality: Capped by the 8GB ceiling, requiring more conservative choices in memory-heavy releases.
  • Lighting Effects: Ray tracing is present but functions mostly as an enthusiast experiment due to the steep performance tax.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Productivity Analysis:

While the hardware is designed to excel in high resolution gaming, its utility for professional tasks is defined by the heavy compute resources packed into its 80 processing units. Moving from gaming to creative work reveals a card that handles dense 3D viewports and complex timelines with steady composure. The RDNA 3.0 architecture provides a massive amount of raw mathematical power that helps maintain responsiveness in specialized software when you are manipulating heavy assets or managing a multi-monitor productivity setup.

The 16GB memory buffer serves as a critical safety net for anyone working with high-resolution textures or multi-layered video projects. Cards with smaller capacities might struggle the moment you load a secondary application or a large data set, but this overhead ensures the system does not immediately stall during an export or a heavy render. Having this much video memory creates a stable foundation for professional workflows that will remain relevant as software requirements continue to climb in the coming years.

  • Rendering and Simulation Performance: The 80 Ray Accelerators assist in hardware-accelerated rendering tasks within applications like Blender, though the specific software translation layer involves different optimization paths than competitors. While it provides excellent speed for traditional rendering, it relies on raw compute strength to power through complicated lighting calculations.
  • Memory Throughput and Bandwidth: With a 256-bit memory bus providing 576 GB/s of bandwidth, the card handles large data transfers with considerable speed. This allows for smooth scrubbing in video editing software where the GPU must quickly fetch and process frames from the buffer to keep up with your editing pace.
  • Precision Compute Tasks: The hardware offers 92 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, which is a major benefit for AI-assisted tools and image processing filters. This raw arithmetic capability allows the card to accelerate modern neural filters and generative tools even without specialized proprietary cores.
  • Modern Video Encoding: Inclusion of hardware AV1 encoding is a significant perk for video professionals and streamers alike. This allows you to produce high-quality exports with efficient file sizes, reducing the strain on your processor and speeding up the final delivery phase of a project.
  • Technical Software Compatibility: In certain engineering and CAD applications like SolidWorks, the architecture often demonstrates a surprising lead in visualization fluidity. It handles the specific viewport instructions of these tools more effectively than many consumer-grade alternatives, making it a viable choice for a dual-purpose workstation and gaming machine.

A 750W power supply is the recommended choice to provide enough energy for the card during heavy sustained workloads. Despite the massive compute potential, it operates efficiently without creating an overwhelming heat signature or excessive noise levels. At its launch MSRP of $549, it stands as a practical option for builders who need a high-end memory buffer and significant processing power for creative tasks without venturing into the extreme price tiers of flagship workstations.

Intel Arc A750
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A750 translates well to standard displays, moving into a professional workload highlights the specific strengths and physical limitations of the Xe-HPG architecture. You are shifting from a hobbyist environment to one where driver stability and software compatibility dictate your daily pace. It is a capable tool for entry-level creators who need high-speed data paths, but it requires a disciplined approach to asset management to avoid hitting the hardware's fixed hardware ceilings. You cannot treat a mid-tier card like a dedicated workstation flagship and expect it to handle massive, unoptimized projects without friction.

The 8GB VRAM buffer acts as a hard boundary for anyone working in 3D rendering or high-resolution video production. Attempting to edit a dense 4K timeline with multiple layers of color grading and complex effects can lead to significant slowdowns when the memory fills up. Professional rendering in applications like Blender often requires the entire scene to fit within this video memory, so 8GB does not provide much headroom for complex geometry or oversized textures. When your project exceeds this limit, the system must swap data to the slower system RAM, causing the creative process to lose its snappy feel. Large, high-density scenes are generally out of reach for this specific memory configuration.

The 256-bit bus width and 512 GB/s memory bandwidth are the standout technical features that help the card punch above its weight in specific tasks. When you are scrubbing through raw footage, this wide highway for data movement prevents the stuttering playback that often affects other cards in this tier. The inclusion of dedicated AV1 encoding is a practical advantage for modern streamers and video editors who need fast exports without relying entirely on the CPU. However, choosing this hardware means stepping away from the established CUDA ecosystem which remains a standard for many professional suites. You gain impressive raw compute through the 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, but you might spend more time managing software updates or ensuring your specific apps are fully optimized for Intel silicon.

  • Video Editing: The high memory bandwidth ensures responsive timeline scrubbing, though the 8GB buffer limits the complexity of 4K effects.
  • 3D Rendering: The 28 ray tracing cores assist with viewport interactivity, but the lack of traditional industry-standard software hooks may require extra configuration.
  • Encoding Power: The built-in AV1 encoder provides a modern solution for high-quality exports and efficient streaming workflows.
  • Computational Tasks: Strong raw compute figures handle standard rendering and AI-assisted image tools with competitive speed.
  • System Requirements: A 650W power supply is the recommended starting point to ensure the system remains stable under heavy sustained rendering loads.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Feature Analysis:

A 260W typical power draw places this hardware in a practical sweet spot for builders who want high-tier performance without the excessive thermal output of flagship silicon. Since it uses two standard 8-pin power connectors, you can avoid the stiffness and clearance issues associated with newer high-density cables. This choice makes the installation process far more straightforward for those reusing an existing power supply or building in a compact chassis where cable management is often a struggle. While the base specification suggests a lower minimum, a 750W power supply is the target for a stable build to ensure the system handles power behavior during sudden visual transitions without hesitation.

The physical footprint and power requirements reflect a design that prioritizes compatibility across a wide range of mid-tower cases and motherboard generations. By utilizing a full PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, the card maintains its data throughput efficiency even if installed in an older PCIe 3.0 slot, preventing the bandwidth limitations found on cards with fewer lanes. This architectural stability ensures the hardware remains predictable and reliable over years of heavy use, rather than requiring a total system overhaul just to accommodate its presence. It is a dense, efficient package that focuses on the core requirements of high-resolution textures and thermal longevity.

  • Thermal Efficiency: The 260W TDP allows for manageable heat levels, ensuring your case fans do not have to run at maximum speeds to keep the internal environment stable.
  • Cable Compatibility: Using two 8-pin connectors means the card works with almost any standard power supply, eliminating the need for specialized adapters or specific ATX 3.0 hardware.
  • VRAM Insurance: A 16GB memory ceiling offers a significant buffer for heavy texture packs in modern titles, reducing the likelihood of stuttering as games become more asset-heavy.
  • Platform Longevity: The combination of RDNA 3.0 architecture and a full x16 interface provides a sturdy foundation that stays relevant as software requirements continue to evolve.
  • Installation Simplicity: The absence of experimental power standards and the manageable power draw make this a low-friction choice for both new builders and those looking for a plug-and-play upgrade.

Choosing this hardware means opting for a balance between raw capability and build-side convenience. You are getting a card that fills the gap for the builder who wants flagship-level visual assets and 1440p stability without the diminishing returns of higher wattage tiers. It avoids the complexities of specialized power management, resulting in a system that stays quiet and operates within safe thermal limits. The focus here is on a reliable experience that values long-term stability and physical compatibility above all else. It is a technical choice for someone who prefers a clean, predictable build over dealing with the heat and power requirements of the absolute top-tier silicon.

Intel Arc A750
Feature Analysis:

The 225W power draw stands out as the primary logistical hurdle for a build centered on the Intel Arc A750, as this hardware pulls more electricity than typically expected in this performance tier. While the base technical specification suggests a 550W power supply, you should pair this card with a 650W unit to accommodate the abrupt power spikes that occur during intensive gaming or complex rendering tasks. Providing this extra room ensures that your system does not shut down unexpectedly when the silicon demands a momentary surge of current. Because the card utilizes a standard combination of one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, you can rely on traditional power cables without the need for specialized adapters or the specific clearance requirements of modern high-wattage headers. This straightforward physical installation makes the card compatible with a wide variety of existing cases and legacy power supplies that haven't been updated for the newest standards.

The 8GB VRAM capacity represents a fixed ceiling that dictates your long-term resolution and texture settings regardless of other internal hardware strengths. While the 256-bit memory bus facilitates a high rate of data transfer, the physical volume of memory is small enough that high-resolution texture packs can quickly saturate the buffer. If you push the software beyond this 8GB limit, you are likely to encounter stuttering as the system struggles to manage data overflow between the card and the rest of your PC. It is a build reality that requires a more disciplined approach to settings, where choosing slightly lower presets often yields a much more stable and consistent experience than chasing visual extremes that the hardware cannot technically sustain over time.

Platform compatibility serves as the final non-negotiable requirement because the Xe-HPG architecture relies heavily on Resizable BAR to function at its intended level of performance. You must verify that your motherboard and processor support this feature, as failing to enable it in the BIOS will lead to a significant and noticeable loss in frame consistency and overall speed. This technical dependency makes the card a poor fit for older systems from the pre-2020 era that lack the necessary firmware support. While driver consistency has improved significantly since the initial launch of the platform, the Arc A750 still appeals most to the type of user who enjoys checking for software updates and fine-tuning system configurations to maximize hardware potential.

  • Power Management: The 225W TDP requires a 650W power supply to ensure stability against power fluctuations during heavy use.
  • Memory Boundaries: The 8GB VRAM limit makes 1080p the ideal target resolution to avoid stuttering caused by over-saturated video memory.
  • Cable Setup: Standard 6-pin and 8-pin power connectors provide broad compatibility with existing ATX power supplies.
  • Platform Connectivity: The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a full-speed data path, though the hardware effectively mandates Resizable BAR support.
  • Software Commitment: Optimal results require frequent driver updates and a motherboard BIOS modern enough to support current communication standards.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Product Name Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP $549
Release Date 2023-07-27
Chipset Manufacturer AMD
Memory Size 16 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2250 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 576.0 GB/s
Base Clock 1287 MHz
Boost Clock 2245 MHz
Shading Units 5120
Ray Tracing Cores 80
TMUs 320
ROPs 160
Pixel Rate 359.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 718.4 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 92.0 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 46.0 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 1.4 TFLOPS
Architecture RDNA 3.0
Process Size 5 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin
TDP 260 W
Suggested PSU 700 W
Intel Arc A750
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A750
MSRP $269
Release Date 2022-10-12
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 2050 MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz
Shading Units 3584
Ray Tracing Cores 28
TMUs 224
ROPs 112
Pixel Rate 268.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 537.6 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 34.4 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 17.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 2.2 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
TDP 225 W
Suggested PSU 650 W

Final Verdict

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a much more capable component that occupies a completely different performance tier than the Intel Arc A750. While both cards utilize a 256-bit memory bus, the GRE arrives with 16GB of GDDR6 memory, providing double the capacity of the 8GB found on the Intel card. This extra headroom is necessary because modern software and high-fidelity textures require significant space. When the memory limit is exceeded, the Intel Arc A750 must swap data to system RAM, which results in stuttering and lost smoothness. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE avoids these bottlenecks entirely, maintaining much higher frame rates across the board.

Hardware specifications further highlight the massive gap in raw power between these two options. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE features RDNA 3 architecture with 80 ray tracing cores and 5120 shading units, generating significantly more compute power than the 28 ray tracing cores and 3584 shading units on the Intel Arc A750. In heavy workloads like 3D rendering or video production, the GRE simply completes tasks faster. The Intel card remains a respectable entry-level choice for standard tasks, but it lacks the sustained throughput required for more demanding visual settings or advanced ray tracing effects.

  • Memory: The 16GB buffer on the GRE handles complex assets with ease, whereas the 8GB on the A750 can become a limiting factor in modern titles.
  • Architecture: RDNA 3 provides a massive leap in efficiency and shading capabilities over the Xe-HPG hardware found in the Intel competitor.
  • Power: The GRE requires more robust power delivery, necessitating a higher wattage power supply to handle its superior performance ceiling.

Buy Radeon RX 7900 GRE if you want a powerful high-end experience with plenty of memory for the future and fast rendering speeds. Buy Intel Arc A750 if you are looking for a more affordable entry-level solution at the $269 MSRP and have a system that supports Resizable BAR configuration.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.