Radeon RX 7900 XT vs Intel Arc A750

Winner:
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Main Difference:
Massive 20GB VRAM pool and nearly triple the raw floating point processing power.
Page Summary:
Radeon RX 7900 XT is the clear winner for high-end gaming and heavy creative workloads due to its vastly superior 20GB VRAM and RDNA 3 architecture, while the Intel Arc A750 serves as a basic entry-level option with significantly lower memory and processing overhead.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

Radeon RX 7900 XT

MSRP:
$749
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
5376
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1387 MHz
Boost Clock:
2394 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
20.0 GB
L3 Cache:
20.0 GB
TDP:
300 W
Socket:
320 bit
Bus Width:
320 bit
Release Date:
2022-11-03
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
73.3
59.2
1440p
64.4
46.6
4K
38.4
38.4
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A750

MSRP:
$269
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3584
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
2050 MHz
Boost Clock:
2400 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
225 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2022-10-12
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
25.8
25
1440p
21.6
19.1
4K
15.9
12.1
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

Radeon RX 7900 XT
Gaming Analysis:

The Radeon RX 7900 XT acts as a high-tier powerhouse for high-resolution gaming, specifically excelling in scenarios where raw speed matters most. While it handles 4K gaming with relative ease, it finds its true stride on high-performance 1440p or ultrawide displays where frame delivery remains fluid and responsive. It often outpaces competitors in standard rasterization, providing a snappy experience in traditional shooters and action titles that rely on raw throughput rather than complex simulated lighting.

A major advantage of this card is the 20GB GDDR6 memory buffer. As modern titles demand more video memory for high-resolution assets, this generous capacity ensures you can maximize texture settings without encountering the stuttering or blurry asset loads common on hardware with less overhead. This large pool of VRAM serves as a buffer against unoptimized releases and massive high-definition texture packs, allowing for a consistent experience without the need to constantly adjust settings to stay within memory limits.

Ray tracing performance requires a more tempered perspective because the hardware, while capable, faces a significant tax when calculating advanced path-traced lighting or complex reflections. In visually demanding titles, enabling these effects can cause a noticeable drop in fluidity compared to pure rasterization. If your priority is seeing every light bounce and sharp shadow at native resolutions, you might find the trade-off in speed too steep. This card is built as a rasterization specialist that favors high frame delivery over cinematic lighting heavy-lifting.

  • Performance at 1440p is consistently sharp, providing the headroom needed for fast-paced competitive play.
  • The 320-bit bus allows for rapid data transfer, which helps maintain stable frame times during visually intense moments.
  • The RDNA 3.0 architecture supports FSR 3 to provide a helpful boost in demanding games when extra fluidity is required.
  • A high-quality 850W power supply is recommended to handle the power demands of this card during peak gaming loads.
Intel Arc A750
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A750 is built for steady performance at 1080p, and while it relies on the older Xe-HPG architecture, it handles standard resolutions with surprising competence. You can expect a fluid experience in a wide variety of titles if you keep your expectations targeted toward a standard display setup. While the hardware can stretch into higher resolutions, it lacks the raw headroom to remain consistently smooth as the pixel count climbs, often leads to a heavy performance trade-off in demanding scenes.

With 8GB of GDDR6 memory, you are working within a clear ceiling for texture quality. In modern titles that push high memory demands, this capacity serves as a bottleneck that prevents you from maxing out every visual slider. Trying to load massive texture packs or ultra-level assets may lead to stuttering or visible hitches when the card runs out of room. The 256-bit bus width is wide for a card at its launch MSRP of $269, which helps data move quickly through the pipeline, but the 8GB limit remains the final decider for your settings.

The hardware includes 28 ray tracing cores, but enabling these effects usually comes with a massive cost to stability. Because these are first-generation cores, they often struggle with the heavy math required for complex lighting or sharp reflections. Toggling these features on can quickly turn a fluid game into a choppy experience. If you decide to use these effects, you will need to rely on Intel XeSS upscaling to regain a playable feel. Without that AI-assisted help, native ray tracing performance is generally too heavy for most AAA games, making standard rasterized settings the better path for a stable experience.

  • 1080p Gaming: A reliable and fluid choice for high settings in most titles.
  • 1440p Gaming: Performance is inconsistent and typically requires dropping to medium settings to stay smooth.
  • 4K Gaming: The hardware lacks the resources for a playable experience at this resolution.
  • Texture Quality: Capped by the 8GB ceiling, requiring more conservative choices in memory-heavy releases.
  • Lighting Effects: Ray tracing is present but functions mostly as an enthusiast experiment due to the steep performance tax.
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Productivity Analysis:

While the hardware is tuned for high frame rates in entertainment, moving into a professional project requires a shift in how you view these specifications. In a production environment, success is measured by whether you can finish a render without hitting a memory ceiling or if the viewport remains responsive while working with dense geometry. The Radeon RX 7900 XT provides a massive 20GB buffer that serves as a safety net for anyone working with 4K video or complex 3D environments that would overwhelm hardware with less capacity. This large pool of video memory determines if you can actually load a massive scene or if you will be forced to spend your time optimizing textures just to keep the software from stalling.

Most mid-range options are capped at lower memory limits which creates a physical wall for editors working on high-bitrate timelines or creators using multiple layers of color grading. This card allows you to keep several demanding applications open simultaneously without the hardware struggling during the data swap. The 320-bit bus acts as a wide path that keeps large files moving quickly, which makes scrubbing through footage feel snappy rather than experiencing the lagging sensation common on more restricted silicon. It provides a level of headroom that prevents the system from gasping when a project grows in complexity or resolution.

  • The 20GB of VRAM allows for loading massive texture sets in 3D applications that would fail on a standard 8GB or 12GB card.
  • With theoretical compute performance reaching 51.5 TFLOPS, the raw math capabilities are ready for heavy lifting in OpenCL or heavy rendering tasks.
  • Integration of an AV1 encoder helps video editors and broadcasters achieve modern compression standards without putting additional strain on the processor.
  • The high memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s ensures that data transitions between the GPU and system memory remain fluid during heavy asset loading.
  • Support for the RDNA 3.0 architecture provides a modern foundation for professional software that utilizes hardware-accelerated rendering.

You should consider the specific software ecosystem when choosing this hardware over competing options. While the card is a powerhouse for standard compute tasks, some specialized rendering engines are deeply optimized for different proprietary platforms. In applications like Blender, the 84 ray tracing cores provide significant assistance, but the software path might not be as lean as it is on alternative architectures. If your professional work relies on specific ray-traced plugins, you have to decide if the generous memory capacity outweighs the potential for longer render times compared to more expensive alternatives that might lack this much VRAM.

Stability under professional load is a primary concern for any independent creator who cannot afford a hardware failure in the middle of a deadline. While many initial driver issues have been addressed through updates, the platform sometimes requires a small amount of manual adjustment to ensure perfectly consistent behavior throughout a long work week. It is a high-value tool for those who understand their software requirements and need the massive memory buffer to handle ambitious projects, though it may require more attention than a strictly plug-and-play solution. If you need a workstation that prioritizes raw data capacity and high-resolution video handling, this card offers a distinct advantage in its class.

Intel Arc A750
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A750 translates well to standard displays, moving into a professional workload highlights the specific strengths and physical limitations of the Xe-HPG architecture. You are shifting from a hobbyist environment to one where driver stability and software compatibility dictate your daily pace. It is a capable tool for entry-level creators who need high-speed data paths, but it requires a disciplined approach to asset management to avoid hitting the hardware's fixed hardware ceilings. You cannot treat a mid-tier card like a dedicated workstation flagship and expect it to handle massive, unoptimized projects without friction.

The 8GB VRAM buffer acts as a hard boundary for anyone working in 3D rendering or high-resolution video production. Attempting to edit a dense 4K timeline with multiple layers of color grading and complex effects can lead to significant slowdowns when the memory fills up. Professional rendering in applications like Blender often requires the entire scene to fit within this video memory, so 8GB does not provide much headroom for complex geometry or oversized textures. When your project exceeds this limit, the system must swap data to the slower system RAM, causing the creative process to lose its snappy feel. Large, high-density scenes are generally out of reach for this specific memory configuration.

The 256-bit bus width and 512 GB/s memory bandwidth are the standout technical features that help the card punch above its weight in specific tasks. When you are scrubbing through raw footage, this wide highway for data movement prevents the stuttering playback that often affects other cards in this tier. The inclusion of dedicated AV1 encoding is a practical advantage for modern streamers and video editors who need fast exports without relying entirely on the CPU. However, choosing this hardware means stepping away from the established CUDA ecosystem which remains a standard for many professional suites. You gain impressive raw compute through the 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, but you might spend more time managing software updates or ensuring your specific apps are fully optimized for Intel silicon.

  • Video Editing: The high memory bandwidth ensures responsive timeline scrubbing, though the 8GB buffer limits the complexity of 4K effects.
  • 3D Rendering: The 28 ray tracing cores assist with viewport interactivity, but the lack of traditional industry-standard software hooks may require extra configuration.
  • Encoding Power: The built-in AV1 encoder provides a modern solution for high-quality exports and efficient streaming workflows.
  • Computational Tasks: Strong raw compute figures handle standard rendering and AI-assisted image tools with competitive speed.
  • System Requirements: A 650W power supply is the recommended starting point to ensure the system remains stable under heavy sustained rendering loads.
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Feature Analysis:

Managing the 300W thermal output of the Radeon RX 7900 XT requires a case with high-volume airflow to prevent heat soak during extended sessions. This hardware pulls significant power and relies on two standard 8-pin PCIe cables, which simplifies the build process since you do not have to worry about the stiffness or clearance issues associated with newer 16-pin adapters. While the launch documentation suggests a smaller power supply might work, pairing this card with an 800W unit is the smarter move for long-term stability. This extra margin accounts for the brief power spikes that often occur when game engines transition between demanding scenes, helping you avoid the random system restarts that can plague builds using bare-minimum power overhead.

The physical footprint of this card is substantial, and its weight can place significant stress on the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot over time. Because the PCB is heavy, using a support bracket is a practical necessity to prevent the board from sagging or warping. Beyond the physical installation, the modern RDNA 3.0 architecture provides a sturdy foundation for high-resolution setups, though the user experience sometimes requires a more hands-on approach. You might find yourself occasionally adjusting software settings or updating drivers to maintain perfect consistency, but the trade-off is access to top-tier hardware that avoids many of the proprietary connector headaches found on competing flagships.

  • The 20GB VRAM pool offers a massive amount of headroom for 4K textures, ensuring the card remains relevant as software demands continue to climb.
  • Using two dedicated 8-pin power cables instead of a daisy-chained single cable ensures cleaner power delivery and reduces the risk of triggering safety shut-offs.
  • The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides the full data bandwidth necessary for modern motherboards to communicate with the GPU without any artificial bottlenecks.
  • A launch MSRP of $749 positions this card as a high-value alternative for builders who prioritize raw hardware specifications over software ecosystem polish.
  • The traditional power connector design means you can use your existing power supply cables without needing to purchase specialized ATX 3.0 hardware or vertical mounting kits.

Refining the system behavior often involves a few minutes in the BIOS or driver software to ensure features like Resize Bar are functioning correctly. It is a build choice that favors the enthusiast who enjoys fine-tuning their machine to get the most out of the silicon. While it may lack the immediate plug-and-play refinement of some alternatives, the combination of a wide memory bus and massive VRAM capacity makes it a durable choice. If you prefer a build that focuses on high-capacity memory and standard physical compatibility, this card delivers the necessary tools for a high-performance workstation or gaming rig that will last through several upgrade cycles.

Intel Arc A750
Feature Analysis:

The 225W power draw stands out as the primary logistical hurdle for a build centered on the Intel Arc A750, as this hardware pulls more electricity than typically expected in this performance tier. While the base technical specification suggests a 550W power supply, you should pair this card with a 650W unit to accommodate the abrupt power spikes that occur during intensive gaming or complex rendering tasks. Providing this extra room ensures that your system does not shut down unexpectedly when the silicon demands a momentary surge of current. Because the card utilizes a standard combination of one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, you can rely on traditional power cables without the need for specialized adapters or the specific clearance requirements of modern high-wattage headers. This straightforward physical installation makes the card compatible with a wide variety of existing cases and legacy power supplies that haven't been updated for the newest standards.

The 8GB VRAM capacity represents a fixed ceiling that dictates your long-term resolution and texture settings regardless of other internal hardware strengths. While the 256-bit memory bus facilitates a high rate of data transfer, the physical volume of memory is small enough that high-resolution texture packs can quickly saturate the buffer. If you push the software beyond this 8GB limit, you are likely to encounter stuttering as the system struggles to manage data overflow between the card and the rest of your PC. It is a build reality that requires a more disciplined approach to settings, where choosing slightly lower presets often yields a much more stable and consistent experience than chasing visual extremes that the hardware cannot technically sustain over time.

Platform compatibility serves as the final non-negotiable requirement because the Xe-HPG architecture relies heavily on Resizable BAR to function at its intended level of performance. You must verify that your motherboard and processor support this feature, as failing to enable it in the BIOS will lead to a significant and noticeable loss in frame consistency and overall speed. This technical dependency makes the card a poor fit for older systems from the pre-2020 era that lack the necessary firmware support. While driver consistency has improved significantly since the initial launch of the platform, the Arc A750 still appeals most to the type of user who enjoys checking for software updates and fine-tuning system configurations to maximize hardware potential.

  • Power Management: The 225W TDP requires a 650W power supply to ensure stability against power fluctuations during heavy use.
  • Memory Boundaries: The 8GB VRAM limit makes 1080p the ideal target resolution to avoid stuttering caused by over-saturated video memory.
  • Cable Setup: Standard 6-pin and 8-pin power connectors provide broad compatibility with existing ATX power supplies.
  • Platform Connectivity: The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a full-speed data path, though the hardware effectively mandates Resizable BAR support.
  • Software Commitment: Optimal results require frequent driver updates and a motherboard BIOS modern enough to support current communication standards.
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Radeon RX 7900 XT
MSRP $749
Release Date 2022-11-03
Chipset Manufacturer AMD
Memory Size 20 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 320 bit
Memory Clock 2500 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 800.0 GB/s
Base Clock 1387 MHz
Boost Clock 2394 MHz
Shading Units 5376
Ray Tracing Cores 84
TMUs 336
ROPs 192
Pixel Rate 459.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 804.4 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 103.0 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 51.5 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 1.6 TFLOPS
Architecture RDNA 3.0
Process Size 5 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin
TDP 300 W
Suggested PSU 800 W
Intel Arc A750
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A750
MSRP $269
Release Date 2022-10-12
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 2050 MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz
Shading Units 3584
Ray Tracing Cores 28
TMUs 224
ROPs 112
Pixel Rate 268.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 537.6 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 34.4 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 17.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 2.2 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
TDP 225 W
Suggested PSU 650 W

Final Verdict

The Radeon RX 7900 XT represents a massive leap in raw capability compared to the Intel Arc A750. With 20GB of GDDR6 memory on a wide 320-bit bus, the Radeon card provides enough headroom for modern gaming engines that chew through texture data at high resolutions. This high memory bandwidth helps load assets quickly and prevents the stuttering that often occurs when a card runs out of available VRAM. The Intel Arc A750 is limited by its 8GB buffer, which creates immediate bottlenecks in modern titles and complex rendering tasks. While the Intel card launched with a $269 MSRP, the Radeon RX 7900 XT was positioned at a $749 MSRP to compete in a completely different performance bracket. The RDNA 3 architecture utilizes a 5nm process that delivers significantly better efficiency than the 6nm Xe-HPG found in the Intel counterpart.

For professionals, the Radeon RX 7900 XT offers substantial value because the 20GB capacity prevents out-of-memory errors during high-resolution video timeline scrubbing or dense 3D scene assembly. The Intel Arc A750 does feature modern hardware for video encoding, but its raw compute power is much lower. The Radeon card features 5376 shading units and 84 Ray Tracing cores, dwarfing the 3584 shading units and 28 RT cores found on the Intel side. This translates to a massive performance gap where the Radeon card maintains smooth visuals in demanding scenarios while the Intel card struggles without dropping settings. The power requirements reflect this difference, as the Radeon model requires much more robust power delivery, but the trade-off is a card that will remain relevant for many years. The 320-bit bus width ensures that data flows fast enough to keep the high-end GPU fed, whereas the 256-bit bus on the A750 is matched for its more modest goals.

  • Buy Radeon RX 7900 XT if you want a high-end experience with a massive memory buffer for future games and heavy creative apps.
  • Buy Intel Arc A750 if you have a strict budget around the $269 MSRP and only require a entry-level solution for basic tasks.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.