Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs Intel Arc A580

Winner:
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Main Difference:
Triple the memory capacity and significantly higher raw computing throughput across all tasks.
Page Summary:
Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the clear winner because it offers massive memory headroom and vastly superior rasterization speed compared to the budget-tier Arc A580.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

Radeon RX 7900 XTX

MSRP:
$999
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
6144
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1929 MHz
Boost Clock:
2498 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
24.0 GB
L3 Cache:
24.0 GB
TDP:
355 W
Socket:
384 bit
Bus Width:
384 bit
Release Date:
2022-11-03
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
79.4
66.4
1440p
71.8
54
4K
44.9
44.9
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A580

MSRP:
$179
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3072
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1700 MHz
Boost Clock:
2000 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
175 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2023-10-10
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
24.2
24
1440p
19.5
16.2
4K
15.4
10.6
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Gaming Analysis:

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a specialized 4K powerhouse built for those who value aggressive raw speed over synthetic lighting tricks. It occupies a rare space where it can trade blows with elite cards in standard tasks, though it faces a significant performance drop once heavy ray tracing is enabled. This card is built for enthusiasts who demand fluid performance at high resolutions and refuse to compromise on texture quality in traditional titles.

The standout hardware choice here is the 24GB of GDDR6 memory on a wide 384-bit bus. While other hardware designs might limit memory capacity, this card provides enough room to crank every texture slider to the maximum and leave them there. You are unlikely to encounter the stuttering or blurred textures that can affect cards with smaller buffers in modern titles. It helps protect your experience against massive texture loads, allowing for high-resolution asset packs and mods without the system struggling because the memory buffer is full.

  • 1080p Performance: High-tier overkill. Your processor will likely become the limiting factor before this card reaches its limit, resulting in exceptionally smooth and responsive motion.
  • 1440p Performance: A natural fit. It handles this resolution with ease, providing the headroom needed for monitors with very high refresh capabilities.
  • 4K Performance: Native 4K is very much the target, maintaining a crisp and playable flow in demanding titles without a forced reliance on upscaling.

However, users should be aware of the trade-offs regarding ray tracing. While the 96 Ray Accelerators can manage lighting effects, the performance hit is substantial. Enabling heavy path tracing in modern titles can lead to an inconsistent experience that lacks the fluidity found in standard rasterization. If you prioritize realistic reflections and complex global illumination, you may find that it trails its primary rivals in these specific lighting tasks.

Physical integration requires a high-quality power supply and a large case. Based on its power draw and RDNA 3.0 architecture, a 850W power supply is recommended to handle transient spikes during intense gaming sessions. You will notice significant heat displacement from the back of your chassis. If your case has restricted airflow, the fans will ramp up as the cooling system works to manage the thermal output of this flagship-tier hardware. It is a power-hungry component that thrives in a chassis with active, high-volume ventilation.

Intel Arc A580
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A580 is a 1080p gaming card that serves as a competent entry point for budget builds but lacks the raw muscle to maintain fluidity at higher resolutions. While it sits on a fast 256-bit memory bus that helps it stay responsive, the Xe-HPG silicon is tuned for standard high-definition monitors. If you try to push this card to run 1440p on modern titles, you will likely encounter chugging frame rates and a loss of responsive snap during fast motion. It is a solid choice for the 1080p gamer who wants high frame rates in esports titles, but it finds its limit when you step into heavier open-world environments.

With 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, your texture budget requires careful management because that amount is becoming the floor for modern software. You can expect crisp visuals on High settings in older titles, but in newer games, you will likely need to drop textures to Medium to avoid stuttering or sudden hitches when you turn a corner in-game. The card has the bandwidth to move data quickly across its wide bus, but the memory capacity is not deep enough for the massive uncompressed texture packs common in current releases.

  • The standard rasterization performance at 1080p is its strongest suit, delivering smooth movement in Vulkan-based games where the Intel drivers are most mature.
  • Ray tracing performance is surprisingly competent for a budget card, holding its ground well thanks to 24 dedicated Ray Tracing units.
  • Using Ray Tracing at 1080p is viable if you pair it with XeSS upscaling, which helps clean up the image and recover performance lost to complex lighting calculations.
  • At 1440p, the performance drops off significantly, particularly in DirectX titles where the driver overhead still causes inconsistent frame times.
  • While the card handles reflections and shadows better than many rivals in its class, it enters slide-show territory when pushed to 4K resolutions.

You must keep the power draw in mind because this card is remarkably thirsty for the level of performance it provides. It pulls over 200W during intense gaming sessions, which is significantly more heat and electricity than some competing cards. This means your case will get warmer and your fans will likely spin louder than they would with a more efficient rival. To support this card and a standard system, a 550W power supply is a sensible minimum. It is a capable, gritty performer for the 1080p enthusiast, but the high power draw and 8GB VRAM limit mean it is a tool for the present rather than a long-term investment. Given its launch MSRP of $179, it offers a specific path into modern features for those who do not mind the trade-off in efficiency.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Productivity Analysis:

While this card excels at pushing high frame rates, the transition to professional workloads introduces a different set of priorities centered on hardware volume. The primary advantage here is the massive 24GB of memory on a 384-bit bus, which provides a level of headroom usually reserved for much more expensive workstation hardware. This buffer is a hard ceiling for many creative tasks, and having this much room makes the difference between a project that finished overnight and one that stopped because the system ran out of room for high-resolution textures or complex geometry. It is a brute-force approach to data that handles massive architectural models or heavy video timelines without the friction of a limited memory pool.

The 960 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data moves with enough velocity to keep playback fluid when scrubbing through large files. Rather than relying on software tricks, the hardware simply has the physical width to handle the load. This makes it a reliable choice for builders who need massive capacity for local machine learning models or 4K video projects but do not want to pay for a dedicated professional-tier card. You are essentially buying a large, fast bucket for your assets, though you must be aware that the software ecosystem sometimes favors other architectures for specific rendering tasks.

  • Video Editing: Dual media engines handle high-resolution exports with significant speed, though specific hardware decoding for some professional camera formats may vary compared to competitors.
  • 3D Modeling: Viewport movement remains smooth even in scenes with high polygon counts, allowing for complex scene navigation provided the work relies on rasterization rather than heavy ray tracing.
  • AI Training: High FP16 performance and the massive 24GB buffer make it a standout for running large local language models or image generation tasks that would fail on cards with less memory.
  • Rendering: Speed remains high in open-source suites like Blender, but the lack of proprietary rendering APIs means you may see longer wait times in path-traced scenes compared to hardware with more specialized software support.

You must consider the trade-off between raw hardware power and industry-standard software integration. Many creative applications are optimized for the CUDA standard, and while this card is incredibly powerful, you may find yourself using translation layers in certain professional suites. If your workflow involves engines like Octane or Redshift that are locked to specific platforms, this card will not be the right tool for the job regardless of its speed. It is a choice for the professional who knows their software supports the HIP API or OpenCL and wants the best possible memory capacity for the money.

Managing this much power requires attention to the rest of your build. Under a sustained render or export, the card has a high power draw that puts a significant load on your thermal solution. An 850W power supply is necessary to ensure the system remains stable during long sessions where the hardware is pushed to its limit. If you are working in a smaller chassis with poor ventilation, the fans will become quite audible as they struggle to move the heat generated by the RDNA 3.0 architecture. It is a loud and powerful component that demands a case with high-volume airflow to maintain stable clock speeds throughout your workday.

Intel Arc A580
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A580 is defined by 1080p stability, shifting to a creative timeline introduces a different set of physical demands on the Xe-HPG architecture. Moving from short bursts of activity into a workstation role requires looking at how the silicon handles sustained data throughput during a long render or a complex 3D export. The high power draw mentioned previously carries over into productivity tasks, where the card pulls significant wattage that produces noticeable heat. You will likely hear the cooling fans working hard to keep temperatures under control when you are grinding through a project. It is a loud, functional experience that reminds you this hardware was built for raw capability rather than thermal silence.

The 8.0 GB VRAM buffer behaves as a hard border for your creative projects. If you are working on standard high-definition video projects or basic 4K cuts, the card feels responsive and manages the assets without much friction. The moment you start stacking heavy color grades or noise reduction, you might encounter significant system hitching because that memory capacity is the floor for modern professional software. However, the 256-bit memory bus provides a genuine advantage many budget contenders lack. With 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, scrubbing through the footage you can fit into memory feels strikingly snappy. It avoids the sticky lag often found on cards with narrower interfaces and moves data with the confidence of a much heavier component.

  • The hardware media engine is a primary reason to consider this card for a work build, as it offers full AV1 encoding and decoding features that are often missing from older budget hardware.
  • Intel QuickSync allows a compatible processor and this discrete card to share the workload during exports, though you must occasionally manage driver updates to ensure professional software recognizes the hardware correctly.
  • The 24 Ray Tracing cores are surprisingly functional for 3D modeling in viewport environments, holding their ground well when handling light and shadow calculations.
  • With 24.6 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, the card can serve as a budget entry point for local AI tasks or neural filters that do not exceed the onboard memory capacity.
  • Scientific simulations needing specialized precision are not the focus here, as the hardware is clearly tuned for creative media and visual tasks rather than high-level research.

Choosing this hardware for a professional environment means accepting a specific kind of ecosystem friction. You are forgoing the longstanding stability of established competitors, so you must be comfortable with the occasional driver hiccup or the need to check compatibility before updating your software. If your income depends on hitting a strict deadline every few hours, the occasional instability might be an issue. For a freelance editor on a budget or a student who needs powerful hardware encoding for video projects, the Arc A580 is a calculated choice. It provides professional-grade video tools in a package that requires a steady hand to manage the high power consumption and evolving driver landscape. Given its launch MSRP of $179, it represents a specific path into advanced media features for those who prioritize bandwidth over a larger memory pool.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Feature Analysis:

A typical thermal design power of 355W creates significant cooling pressure that defines how you must approach your chassis selection and fan configuration. While the base specifications might suggest a lower ceiling, stability requires an 850W power supply to properly insulate the system against the sudden power spikes common in high-end RDNA 3.0 hardware. Failing to provide this power headroom can result in unexpected system shutdowns during intense transitions, meaning the quality of your power delivery is just as important as the card itself. It is a high-energy component that moves a lot of hot air, so you will need a case with unrestricted intake and exhaust to keep internal temperatures from soaking your other parts.

Installation is relatively predictable because the design relies on 2x 8-pin power connectors rather than the newer, more rigid cable standards found on some competing flagships. This allows you to use standard PCIe cables from your existing power supply without needing specialized adapters or worrying about delicate cable bends near the side panel of your case. Keep in mind that these cards are physically massive and often occupy three slots, which can put significant mechanical stress on the motherboard. Using a support bracket is a practical necessity to prevent the PCB from warping under its own weight over time. It is a dense, heavy piece of engineering that demands a secure mounting environment and plenty of physical clearance.

  • The 24GB memory pool acts as a massive buffer for 4K textures and heavy asset packs, making it almost impossible to hit a memory wall in standard gaming.
  • Standard power connectors simplify the building process and allow for cleaner cable management with traditional power supply units.
  • High thermal output requires a deliberate cooling strategy involving multiple intake fans to maintain stable clock speeds during long sessions.
  • The physical dimensions of the card can obstruct other PCIe slots, so you should check your motherboard layout if you plan to use capture cards or sound cards.
  • RDNA 3.0 architecture provides a massive leap in raw hardware capacity, though this power comes at the cost of higher electricity usage and heat generation.

You are ultimately balancing raw hardware volume against the logistical requirements of a flagship-tier build. While the internal specifications are elite, the reality of living with this card involves managing its heat and ensuring your power delivery is up to the task. It is a hardware-first solution that trades software-side polish for massive physical resources and a wide memory bus. If you have the room in your case and a power supply that can weather the occasional surge, it offers a level of longevity that is hard to find in hardware with more restrictive memory configurations. It remains a serious commitment for the builder who prefers physical headroom over architectural efficiency.

Intel Arc A580
Feature Analysis:

A typical 175W TDP rating suggests a mid-range thermal profile, but the physical reality of the Xe-HPG architecture is that it pushes considerable heat into your chassis during sustained use. This power demand is high for an entry-level part, meaning your case airflow needs to be active rather than passive to prevent the ambient temperature from climbing. While the official minimum specification suggests a 450W power supply, a 550W unit is the safer choice to handle the power spikes common with these Alchemist chips. Using a power supply with a bit more breathing room ensures the system remains stable when the hardware is under full load.

The 8.0 GB VRAM capacity serves as a strict boundary for your visual settings, acting as a ceiling that stays relevant throughout the life of the build. In modern titles, this amount of memory is the baseline, often requiring you to stay at 1080p and avoid the highest texture presets to maintain a smooth experience. The 256-bit bus helps move data with significant speed, yet the physical capacity is shallow enough that 1440p textures can quickly lead to stuttering. It is a build designed for the standard high-definition era, requiring a user who is comfortable managing settings rather than set-and-forget high-resolution gaming.

  • The card utilizes two standard 8-pin power connectors, which avoids the need for specialized adapters and ensures compatibility with traditional power supply cables.
  • A full PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides the maximum available bandwidth, ensuring the card does not suffer from the performance penalties sometimes found on budget hardware with fewer lanes.
  • The hardware is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, which introduced dedicated silicon for complex tasks like ray tracing and AI-enhanced upscaling.
  • Integrating this hardware into your build requires a motherboard that supports Resizable BAR, as the architecture relies heavily on this feature to function at its intended speed.
  • Early software hurdles have largely been addressed through consistent updates, though the platform still requires a more hands-on approach to driver management than established rivals.

Building with the Arc A580 means accepting a specific kind of technical friction in exchange for its unique feature set. You are choosing a path that prioritizes raw bandwidth and modern architecture over the polished, plug-and-play nature of more expensive ecosystems. Because it draws a notable amount of electricity for its performance class, the noise and heat from your cooling fans will be a constant presence during heavy sessions. It serves as a gritty, capable entry point into modern computing for those who understand that the 8.0 GB limit and the thermal output are the primary trade-offs for its launch MSRP of $179.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Product Name Radeon RX 7900 XTX
MSRP $999
Release Date 2022-11-03
Chipset Manufacturer AMD
Memory Size 24 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 384 bit
Memory Clock 2500 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 960.0 GB/s
Base Clock 1929 MHz
Boost Clock 2498 MHz
Shading Units 6144
Ray Tracing Cores 96
TMUs 384
ROPs 192
Pixel Rate 479.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 959.2 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 122.8 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 61.4 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 1.9 TFLOPS
Architecture RDNA 3.0
Process Size 5 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin
TDP 355 W
Suggested PSU 850 W
Intel Arc A580
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A580
MSRP $179
Release Date 2023-10-10
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 1700 MHz
Boost Clock 2000 MHz
Shading Units 3072
Ray Tracing Cores 24
TMUs 192
ROPs 96
Pixel Rate 192 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 384 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 24.6 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 1.5 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin
TDP 175 W
Suggested PSU 550 W

Final Verdict

Choosing between these two cards involves looking at two entirely different categories of hardware performance. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a flagship built with 24GB of GDDR6 memory and a massive 384-bit bus, which provides the bandwidth necessary to handle the most demanding textures and settings without breaking a sweat. It uses the RDNA 3 chiplet architecture to deliver a level of fluid motion and visual fidelity that the smaller Intel card cannot hope to match in any scenario. The sheer scale of the hardware, from the shading units to the dedicated ray accelerators, puts it in a different league entirely for both enthusiast gaming and heavy creative lifting.

Intel entered the market with the Arc A580 to provide a functional entry point for builders, but it faces significant hurdles when compared to high-end silicon. With only 8GB of memory, the Arc card often runs into limitations in modern titles where high-resolution assets quickly fill up the available buffer, leading to stuttering or forced settings reductions. While the Intel hardware includes modern features like AV1 encoding and XeSS upscaling support, the raw math throughput is a fraction of what the AMD card provides. The power requirements reflect this gap, as the AMD card demands a much more robust power supply to fuel its high-speed performance, whereas the Intel card is designed for simpler, more localized tasks.

  • Memory and Bandwidth: The 24GB buffer on the AMD card ensures that you will not see the dreaded memory wall for years, while the 8GB on the A580 is already feeling the pressure.
  • Architecture and Scale: AMD uses a 5nm process and high-frequency clocks to push much higher frames, while the Intel 6nm design is more about providing a baseline experience.
  • Longevity: The massive memory capacity and mature driver stack make the AMD card a far safer bet for a long-term system build.

Buy Radeon RX 7900 XTX if you want a top-tier enthusiast experience with enough memory to handle every modern game at maximum settings without compromise.

Buy Intel Arc A580 if you are strictly focused on a basic entry-level build and only need enough power for standard tasks on a very tight initial hardware budget.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.