Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs Intel Arc A750

Winner:
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Main Difference:
Massive VRAM advantage and superior compute power for demanding high resolution gaming workloads.
Page Summary:
Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the clear choice for high-end systems because it offers three times the memory and vastly superior shading performance compared to the budget-oriented Intel Arc A750.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

Radeon RX 7900 XTX

MSRP:
$999
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
6144
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1929 MHz
Boost Clock:
2498 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
24.0 GB
L3 Cache:
24.0 GB
TDP:
355 W
Socket:
384 bit
Bus Width:
384 bit
Release Date:
2022-11-03
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
79.4
66.4
1440p
71.8
54
4K
44.9
44.9
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A750

MSRP:
$269
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3584
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
2050 MHz
Boost Clock:
2400 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
225 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2022-10-12
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
25.8
25
1440p
21.6
19.1
4K
15.9
12.1
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Gaming Analysis:

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a specialized 4K powerhouse built for those who value aggressive raw speed over synthetic lighting tricks. It occupies a rare space where it can trade blows with elite cards in standard tasks, though it faces a significant performance drop once heavy ray tracing is enabled. This card is built for enthusiasts who demand fluid performance at high resolutions and refuse to compromise on texture quality in traditional titles.

The standout hardware choice here is the 24GB of GDDR6 memory on a wide 384-bit bus. While other hardware designs might limit memory capacity, this card provides enough room to crank every texture slider to the maximum and leave them there. You are unlikely to encounter the stuttering or blurred textures that can affect cards with smaller buffers in modern titles. It helps protect your experience against massive texture loads, allowing for high-resolution asset packs and mods without the system struggling because the memory buffer is full.

  • 1080p Performance: High-tier overkill. Your processor will likely become the limiting factor before this card reaches its limit, resulting in exceptionally smooth and responsive motion.
  • 1440p Performance: A natural fit. It handles this resolution with ease, providing the headroom needed for monitors with very high refresh capabilities.
  • 4K Performance: Native 4K is very much the target, maintaining a crisp and playable flow in demanding titles without a forced reliance on upscaling.

However, users should be aware of the trade-offs regarding ray tracing. While the 96 Ray Accelerators can manage lighting effects, the performance hit is substantial. Enabling heavy path tracing in modern titles can lead to an inconsistent experience that lacks the fluidity found in standard rasterization. If you prioritize realistic reflections and complex global illumination, you may find that it trails its primary rivals in these specific lighting tasks.

Physical integration requires a high-quality power supply and a large case. Based on its power draw and RDNA 3.0 architecture, a 850W power supply is recommended to handle transient spikes during intense gaming sessions. You will notice significant heat displacement from the back of your chassis. If your case has restricted airflow, the fans will ramp up as the cooling system works to manage the thermal output of this flagship-tier hardware. It is a power-hungry component that thrives in a chassis with active, high-volume ventilation.

Intel Arc A750
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A750 is built for steady performance at 1080p, and while it relies on the older Xe-HPG architecture, it handles standard resolutions with surprising competence. You can expect a fluid experience in a wide variety of titles if you keep your expectations targeted toward a standard display setup. While the hardware can stretch into higher resolutions, it lacks the raw headroom to remain consistently smooth as the pixel count climbs, often leads to a heavy performance trade-off in demanding scenes.

With 8GB of GDDR6 memory, you are working within a clear ceiling for texture quality. In modern titles that push high memory demands, this capacity serves as a bottleneck that prevents you from maxing out every visual slider. Trying to load massive texture packs or ultra-level assets may lead to stuttering or visible hitches when the card runs out of room. The 256-bit bus width is wide for a card at its launch MSRP of $269, which helps data move quickly through the pipeline, but the 8GB limit remains the final decider for your settings.

The hardware includes 28 ray tracing cores, but enabling these effects usually comes with a massive cost to stability. Because these are first-generation cores, they often struggle with the heavy math required for complex lighting or sharp reflections. Toggling these features on can quickly turn a fluid game into a choppy experience. If you decide to use these effects, you will need to rely on Intel XeSS upscaling to regain a playable feel. Without that AI-assisted help, native ray tracing performance is generally too heavy for most AAA games, making standard rasterized settings the better path for a stable experience.

  • 1080p Gaming: A reliable and fluid choice for high settings in most titles.
  • 1440p Gaming: Performance is inconsistent and typically requires dropping to medium settings to stay smooth.
  • 4K Gaming: The hardware lacks the resources for a playable experience at this resolution.
  • Texture Quality: Capped by the 8GB ceiling, requiring more conservative choices in memory-heavy releases.
  • Lighting Effects: Ray tracing is present but functions mostly as an enthusiast experiment due to the steep performance tax.
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Productivity Analysis:

While this card excels at pushing high frame rates, the transition to professional workloads introduces a different set of priorities centered on hardware volume. The primary advantage here is the massive 24GB of memory on a 384-bit bus, which provides a level of headroom usually reserved for much more expensive workstation hardware. This buffer is a hard ceiling for many creative tasks, and having this much room makes the difference between a project that finished overnight and one that stopped because the system ran out of room for high-resolution textures or complex geometry. It is a brute-force approach to data that handles massive architectural models or heavy video timelines without the friction of a limited memory pool.

The 960 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data moves with enough velocity to keep playback fluid when scrubbing through large files. Rather than relying on software tricks, the hardware simply has the physical width to handle the load. This makes it a reliable choice for builders who need massive capacity for local machine learning models or 4K video projects but do not want to pay for a dedicated professional-tier card. You are essentially buying a large, fast bucket for your assets, though you must be aware that the software ecosystem sometimes favors other architectures for specific rendering tasks.

  • Video Editing: Dual media engines handle high-resolution exports with significant speed, though specific hardware decoding for some professional camera formats may vary compared to competitors.
  • 3D Modeling: Viewport movement remains smooth even in scenes with high polygon counts, allowing for complex scene navigation provided the work relies on rasterization rather than heavy ray tracing.
  • AI Training: High FP16 performance and the massive 24GB buffer make it a standout for running large local language models or image generation tasks that would fail on cards with less memory.
  • Rendering: Speed remains high in open-source suites like Blender, but the lack of proprietary rendering APIs means you may see longer wait times in path-traced scenes compared to hardware with more specialized software support.

You must consider the trade-off between raw hardware power and industry-standard software integration. Many creative applications are optimized for the CUDA standard, and while this card is incredibly powerful, you may find yourself using translation layers in certain professional suites. If your workflow involves engines like Octane or Redshift that are locked to specific platforms, this card will not be the right tool for the job regardless of its speed. It is a choice for the professional who knows their software supports the HIP API or OpenCL and wants the best possible memory capacity for the money.

Managing this much power requires attention to the rest of your build. Under a sustained render or export, the card has a high power draw that puts a significant load on your thermal solution. An 850W power supply is necessary to ensure the system remains stable during long sessions where the hardware is pushed to its limit. If you are working in a smaller chassis with poor ventilation, the fans will become quite audible as they struggle to move the heat generated by the RDNA 3.0 architecture. It is a loud and powerful component that demands a case with high-volume airflow to maintain stable clock speeds throughout your workday.

Intel Arc A750
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A750 translates well to standard displays, moving into a professional workload highlights the specific strengths and physical limitations of the Xe-HPG architecture. You are shifting from a hobbyist environment to one where driver stability and software compatibility dictate your daily pace. It is a capable tool for entry-level creators who need high-speed data paths, but it requires a disciplined approach to asset management to avoid hitting the hardware's fixed hardware ceilings. You cannot treat a mid-tier card like a dedicated workstation flagship and expect it to handle massive, unoptimized projects without friction.

The 8GB VRAM buffer acts as a hard boundary for anyone working in 3D rendering or high-resolution video production. Attempting to edit a dense 4K timeline with multiple layers of color grading and complex effects can lead to significant slowdowns when the memory fills up. Professional rendering in applications like Blender often requires the entire scene to fit within this video memory, so 8GB does not provide much headroom for complex geometry or oversized textures. When your project exceeds this limit, the system must swap data to the slower system RAM, causing the creative process to lose its snappy feel. Large, high-density scenes are generally out of reach for this specific memory configuration.

The 256-bit bus width and 512 GB/s memory bandwidth are the standout technical features that help the card punch above its weight in specific tasks. When you are scrubbing through raw footage, this wide highway for data movement prevents the stuttering playback that often affects other cards in this tier. The inclusion of dedicated AV1 encoding is a practical advantage for modern streamers and video editors who need fast exports without relying entirely on the CPU. However, choosing this hardware means stepping away from the established CUDA ecosystem which remains a standard for many professional suites. You gain impressive raw compute through the 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, but you might spend more time managing software updates or ensuring your specific apps are fully optimized for Intel silicon.

  • Video Editing: The high memory bandwidth ensures responsive timeline scrubbing, though the 8GB buffer limits the complexity of 4K effects.
  • 3D Rendering: The 28 ray tracing cores assist with viewport interactivity, but the lack of traditional industry-standard software hooks may require extra configuration.
  • Encoding Power: The built-in AV1 encoder provides a modern solution for high-quality exports and efficient streaming workflows.
  • Computational Tasks: Strong raw compute figures handle standard rendering and AI-assisted image tools with competitive speed.
  • System Requirements: A 650W power supply is the recommended starting point to ensure the system remains stable under heavy sustained rendering loads.
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Feature Analysis:

A typical thermal design power of 355W creates significant cooling pressure that defines how you must approach your chassis selection and fan configuration. While the base specifications might suggest a lower ceiling, stability requires an 850W power supply to properly insulate the system against the sudden power spikes common in high-end RDNA 3.0 hardware. Failing to provide this power headroom can result in unexpected system shutdowns during intense transitions, meaning the quality of your power delivery is just as important as the card itself. It is a high-energy component that moves a lot of hot air, so you will need a case with unrestricted intake and exhaust to keep internal temperatures from soaking your other parts.

Installation is relatively predictable because the design relies on 2x 8-pin power connectors rather than the newer, more rigid cable standards found on some competing flagships. This allows you to use standard PCIe cables from your existing power supply without needing specialized adapters or worrying about delicate cable bends near the side panel of your case. Keep in mind that these cards are physically massive and often occupy three slots, which can put significant mechanical stress on the motherboard. Using a support bracket is a practical necessity to prevent the PCB from warping under its own weight over time. It is a dense, heavy piece of engineering that demands a secure mounting environment and plenty of physical clearance.

  • The 24GB memory pool acts as a massive buffer for 4K textures and heavy asset packs, making it almost impossible to hit a memory wall in standard gaming.
  • Standard power connectors simplify the building process and allow for cleaner cable management with traditional power supply units.
  • High thermal output requires a deliberate cooling strategy involving multiple intake fans to maintain stable clock speeds during long sessions.
  • The physical dimensions of the card can obstruct other PCIe slots, so you should check your motherboard layout if you plan to use capture cards or sound cards.
  • RDNA 3.0 architecture provides a massive leap in raw hardware capacity, though this power comes at the cost of higher electricity usage and heat generation.

You are ultimately balancing raw hardware volume against the logistical requirements of a flagship-tier build. While the internal specifications are elite, the reality of living with this card involves managing its heat and ensuring your power delivery is up to the task. It is a hardware-first solution that trades software-side polish for massive physical resources and a wide memory bus. If you have the room in your case and a power supply that can weather the occasional surge, it offers a level of longevity that is hard to find in hardware with more restrictive memory configurations. It remains a serious commitment for the builder who prefers physical headroom over architectural efficiency.

Intel Arc A750
Feature Analysis:

The 225W power draw stands out as the primary logistical hurdle for a build centered on the Intel Arc A750, as this hardware pulls more electricity than typically expected in this performance tier. While the base technical specification suggests a 550W power supply, you should pair this card with a 650W unit to accommodate the abrupt power spikes that occur during intensive gaming or complex rendering tasks. Providing this extra room ensures that your system does not shut down unexpectedly when the silicon demands a momentary surge of current. Because the card utilizes a standard combination of one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, you can rely on traditional power cables without the need for specialized adapters or the specific clearance requirements of modern high-wattage headers. This straightforward physical installation makes the card compatible with a wide variety of existing cases and legacy power supplies that haven't been updated for the newest standards.

The 8GB VRAM capacity represents a fixed ceiling that dictates your long-term resolution and texture settings regardless of other internal hardware strengths. While the 256-bit memory bus facilitates a high rate of data transfer, the physical volume of memory is small enough that high-resolution texture packs can quickly saturate the buffer. If you push the software beyond this 8GB limit, you are likely to encounter stuttering as the system struggles to manage data overflow between the card and the rest of your PC. It is a build reality that requires a more disciplined approach to settings, where choosing slightly lower presets often yields a much more stable and consistent experience than chasing visual extremes that the hardware cannot technically sustain over time.

Platform compatibility serves as the final non-negotiable requirement because the Xe-HPG architecture relies heavily on Resizable BAR to function at its intended level of performance. You must verify that your motherboard and processor support this feature, as failing to enable it in the BIOS will lead to a significant and noticeable loss in frame consistency and overall speed. This technical dependency makes the card a poor fit for older systems from the pre-2020 era that lack the necessary firmware support. While driver consistency has improved significantly since the initial launch of the platform, the Arc A750 still appeals most to the type of user who enjoys checking for software updates and fine-tuning system configurations to maximize hardware potential.

  • Power Management: The 225W TDP requires a 650W power supply to ensure stability against power fluctuations during heavy use.
  • Memory Boundaries: The 8GB VRAM limit makes 1080p the ideal target resolution to avoid stuttering caused by over-saturated video memory.
  • Cable Setup: Standard 6-pin and 8-pin power connectors provide broad compatibility with existing ATX power supplies.
  • Platform Connectivity: The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a full-speed data path, though the hardware effectively mandates Resizable BAR support.
  • Software Commitment: Optimal results require frequent driver updates and a motherboard BIOS modern enough to support current communication standards.
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Product Name Radeon RX 7900 XTX
MSRP $999
Release Date 2022-11-03
Chipset Manufacturer AMD
Memory Size 24 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 384 bit
Memory Clock 2500 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 960.0 GB/s
Base Clock 1929 MHz
Boost Clock 2498 MHz
Shading Units 6144
Ray Tracing Cores 96
TMUs 384
ROPs 192
Pixel Rate 479.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 959.2 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 122.8 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 61.4 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 1.9 TFLOPS
Architecture RDNA 3.0
Process Size 5 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin
TDP 355 W
Suggested PSU 850 W
Intel Arc A750
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A750
MSRP $269
Release Date 2022-10-12
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 2050 MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz
Shading Units 3584
Ray Tracing Cores 28
TMUs 224
ROPs 112
Pixel Rate 268.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 537.6 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 34.4 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 17.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 2.2 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
TDP 225 W
Suggested PSU 650 W

Final Verdict

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX stands as a flagship power house that fundamentally changes how a system handles modern visual fidelity. Built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a massive 24GB pool of GDDR6 memory, this card eliminates the technical bottlenecks that often plague hardware with smaller buffers. It features a wide 384-bit bus and nearly 1000 GB/s of memory bandwidth to ensure that high resolution textures load without hesitation or stuttering during intense sequences. While the $999 MSRP puts it in a different category than entry level gear, the performance gap is nearly impossible to ignore for anyone moving beyond basic display setups.

By comparison, the Intel Arc A750 targets a completely different type of builder. With its $269 MSRP at launch, it provides a functional entry point into modern features like AV1 encoding but carries significant hardware limitations. The 8GB memory capacity on the Intel card restricts its long term utility when dealing with the heavy VRAM requirements of recent software releases. Furthermore, the Radeon RX 7900 XTX features 96 dedicated Ray Tracing units compared to only 28 on the Intel chip, leading to a much faster and more stable experience when enabling complex lighting effects that would otherwise cause the Intel hardware to struggle.

For those focused on professional tasks or heavy creative software, the Radeon card offers a 384-bit memory bus that provides a clear lead in data throughput. The Intel Arc A750 is a respectable effort for a first-generation product, but it lacks the raw shading power and thermal headroom found in the Radeon flagship. Users should also note the power requirements since the Radeon card demands a much larger power supply to feed its dual 8-pin connectors and high compute potential.

  • Buy Radeon RX 7900 XTX if you want a top-tier experience at the highest settings and need the massive 24GB frame buffer for demanding creative professional workloads or future-proofing.
  • Buy Intel Arc A750 if you are sticking to a tighter budget focused on standard resolutions and want basic access to modern features like AV1 hardware encoding.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.