Radeon RX 9070 XT vs Intel Arc A750

Winner:
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Main Difference:
Triple the computing power and double the memory capacity on a newer architecture.
Page Summary:
Radeon RX 9070 XT is the clear winner because it offers roughly three times the raw performance and significantly better memory headroom for modern high-resolution gaming compared to the Intel Arc A750.
Last updated:
January 31, 2026

The Essentials

Radeon RX 9070 XT

MSRP:
$599
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
4096
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
1660 MHz
Boost Clock:
2970 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
16.0 GB
L3 Cache:
16.0 GB
TDP:
304 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2025-03-06
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
76.1
72
1440p
68.7
58.7
4K
50
50
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity

Intel Arc A750

MSRP:
$269
See Current Price
Spec Sheet:
Core Count:
3584
Thread Count:
Base Clock:
2050 MHz
Boost Clock:
2400 MHz
Integrated Graphics:
VRAM:
8.0 GB
L3 Cache:
8.0 GB
TDP:
225 W
Socket:
256 bit
Bus Width:
256 bit
Release Date:
2022-10-12
Gaming Scores:
(Higher is better)
Resolution
Rasterization
Ray Tracing
1080p
25.8
25
1440p
21.6
19.1
4K
15.9
12.1
Gaming and Productivity Scores:
(Higher is better)
Gaming
Productivity
Note about scores:
We measure this card's performance against the absolute best GPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific titles may deviate from this average depending on how that game is optimized.
Note about scores:
We measure this processor's performance against the absolute best CPU currently available. The numbers show the percentage of performance you get compared to the market leader in both gaming and workstation tasks, with the leader at 100. These scores are aggregated from a wide range of different games and applications to create a reliable average. However, keep in mind that performance in specific software may deviate from this average depending on how that program is optimized.

Performance Deep Dive

Radeon RX 9070 XT
Gaming Analysis:

The Radeon RX 9070 XT functions as a high-performance 1440p solution that bridges the gap between enthusiast hardware and more accessible price tiers. At higher resolutions, the card maintains a steady pace across standard rasterized titles and often competes closely with more expensive alternatives. While it can handle 4K workloads, the frame delivery becomes heavier and less consistent once the pixel count increases. This card is built for the sweet spot of modern gaming setups where smooth movement is prioritized over raw resolution scaling.

The 16GB VRAM buffer serves as an insurance policy against the stuttering issues that can impact cards with smaller memory pools. You can push texture settings to their maximum in demanding titles without hitting a hard wall or seeing the distracting texture pop-in that breaks visual clarity. With a 256-bit memory bus, data moves fast enough to keep 1% low frames stable, which prevents those tiny hitches that can make a game feel choppy even when the average speed seems high.

  • Standard Rasterization: High-tier 1440p performance that remains fluid in fast-paced shooters and open-world environments.
  • Ray Tracing Reality: Hardware-accelerated lighting is a functional feature on this RDNA 4.0 architecture, though heavy path-tracing will likely require support from upscaling to avoid a sluggish image.
  • Texture Quality: The 16GB GDDR6 pool removes the ceiling on texture settings, allowing for uncompressed environments in modern games.
  • AI Upscaling: FSR 4.0 uses the new hardware accelerators to clean up edges, making the jump to higher resolutions feel more natural when you want to trade some speed for more pixels.

Ray tracing on this RDNA 4.0 part represents a notable step forward, turning lighting effects into a usable tool rather than a theoretical experiment. In games with moderate lighting implementations, reflections and shadows stay sharp without causing a total collapse in speed. You should still be mindful of extreme settings, however. Turning every lighting feature to the maximum will still punish the hardware and potentially turn a fluid experience into a flickering slideshow unless you use upscaling to help manage the load. This card requires a 850W power supply to ensure the system remains stable under heavy gaming loads.

Intel Arc A750
Gaming Analysis:

The Intel Arc A750 is built for steady performance at 1080p, and while it relies on the older Xe-HPG architecture, it handles standard resolutions with surprising competence. You can expect a fluid experience in a wide variety of titles if you keep your expectations targeted toward a standard display setup. While the hardware can stretch into higher resolutions, it lacks the raw headroom to remain consistently smooth as the pixel count climbs, often leads to a heavy performance trade-off in demanding scenes.

With 8GB of GDDR6 memory, you are working within a clear ceiling for texture quality. In modern titles that push high memory demands, this capacity serves as a bottleneck that prevents you from maxing out every visual slider. Trying to load massive texture packs or ultra-level assets may lead to stuttering or visible hitches when the card runs out of room. The 256-bit bus width is wide for a card at its launch MSRP of $269, which helps data move quickly through the pipeline, but the 8GB limit remains the final decider for your settings.

The hardware includes 28 ray tracing cores, but enabling these effects usually comes with a massive cost to stability. Because these are first-generation cores, they often struggle with the heavy math required for complex lighting or sharp reflections. Toggling these features on can quickly turn a fluid game into a choppy experience. If you decide to use these effects, you will need to rely on Intel XeSS upscaling to regain a playable feel. Without that AI-assisted help, native ray tracing performance is generally too heavy for most AAA games, making standard rasterized settings the better path for a stable experience.

  • 1080p Gaming: A reliable and fluid choice for high settings in most titles.
  • 1440p Gaming: Performance is inconsistent and typically requires dropping to medium settings to stay smooth.
  • 4K Gaming: The hardware lacks the resources for a playable experience at this resolution.
  • Texture Quality: Capped by the 8GB ceiling, requiring more conservative choices in memory-heavy releases.
  • Lighting Effects: Ray tracing is present but functions mostly as an enthusiast experiment due to the steep performance tax.
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Productivity Analysis:

While this hardware excels at pushing frames in a 1440p gaming environment, the conversation changes when you transition from entertainment to professional production. The Radeon RX 9070 XT transitions into a workstation tool that relies on its raw compute density and memory capacity to handle intense creative projects. You are looking for a component that stays responsive during a long editing session or when managing a dense 3D viewport where hardware limitations typically cause friction. This card offers a stable foundation for those who need to balance a heavy workload without the restrictive bottlenecks found on cards with less memory overhead.

The 16GB VRAM buffer serves as a functional boundary between a standard utility and a professional asset. High-resolution textures and complex project files require a physical space to sit, and having this much room prevents the system from stuttering when your software demand spikes. You can keep multiple creative applications open alongside a browser without seeing your workflow degrade into a choppy mess. It is a practical amount of headroom that allows for more disorganized or asset-heavy project files that would otherwise max out the memory pool on lesser hardware.

  • Video Workflows: The 256-bit bus and 644 GB/s bandwidth help with scrubbing through high-bitrate timelines so you do not experience the typical lag when moving the playhead.
  • Compute Density: With 48.7 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, the architecture handles complex mathematical calculations and rendering tasks with a level of speed that reduces your waiting time between iterations.
  • AI Tasking: The hardware accelerators provide a significant boost for neural-based tools and modern denoising features that rely on the 97.3 TFLOPS of FP16 capability.
  • Encoding Features: Dedicated AV1 support allows for faster exports and better data efficiency, keeping your machine usable for other tasks while the final file is processing.
  • Structural Reliability: The 4096 shading units provide enough raw processing power to maintain a fluid experience even as your 3D scenes grow in complexity and geometry.

You should be aware of the software ecosystem because some specialized professional tools are still heavily optimized for different proprietary languages. While RDNA 4.0 has improved the way this hardware interacts with creative suites, you might still encounter a specific plugin or niche simulation tool that requires a bit more configuration to run perfectly. This represents a trade-off where you gain a massive amount of uncompressed texture capacity and raw speed in exchange for being slightly more hands-on with your driver setup. For many freelancers, the high compute density relative to the 599 dollar MSRP at launch makes this a logical choice for a multi-purpose machine.

Managing the thermal output is necessary when the card is fully saturated during an overnight render or a long video export. It draws significant power to maintain its performance levels, which means you need an 800W power supply to keep the entire system from experiencing any power-related instability during peak usage. Making sure your case has a clear path for exhaust will prevent the heat from soaking into your other components during these heavy sessions. It is the expected behavior for a high-performance engine that trades power for the ability to handle demanding professional files without the memory-related errors that plague smaller cards.

Intel Arc A750
Productivity Analysis:

While the gaming side of the Intel Arc A750 translates well to standard displays, moving into a professional workload highlights the specific strengths and physical limitations of the Xe-HPG architecture. You are shifting from a hobbyist environment to one where driver stability and software compatibility dictate your daily pace. It is a capable tool for entry-level creators who need high-speed data paths, but it requires a disciplined approach to asset management to avoid hitting the hardware's fixed hardware ceilings. You cannot treat a mid-tier card like a dedicated workstation flagship and expect it to handle massive, unoptimized projects without friction.

The 8GB VRAM buffer acts as a hard boundary for anyone working in 3D rendering or high-resolution video production. Attempting to edit a dense 4K timeline with multiple layers of color grading and complex effects can lead to significant slowdowns when the memory fills up. Professional rendering in applications like Blender often requires the entire scene to fit within this video memory, so 8GB does not provide much headroom for complex geometry or oversized textures. When your project exceeds this limit, the system must swap data to the slower system RAM, causing the creative process to lose its snappy feel. Large, high-density scenes are generally out of reach for this specific memory configuration.

The 256-bit bus width and 512 GB/s memory bandwidth are the standout technical features that help the card punch above its weight in specific tasks. When you are scrubbing through raw footage, this wide highway for data movement prevents the stuttering playback that often affects other cards in this tier. The inclusion of dedicated AV1 encoding is a practical advantage for modern streamers and video editors who need fast exports without relying entirely on the CPU. However, choosing this hardware means stepping away from the established CUDA ecosystem which remains a standard for many professional suites. You gain impressive raw compute through the 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, but you might spend more time managing software updates or ensuring your specific apps are fully optimized for Intel silicon.

  • Video Editing: The high memory bandwidth ensures responsive timeline scrubbing, though the 8GB buffer limits the complexity of 4K effects.
  • 3D Rendering: The 28 ray tracing cores assist with viewport interactivity, but the lack of traditional industry-standard software hooks may require extra configuration.
  • Encoding Power: The built-in AV1 encoder provides a modern solution for high-quality exports and efficient streaming workflows.
  • Computational Tasks: Strong raw compute figures handle standard rendering and AI-assisted image tools with competitive speed.
  • System Requirements: A 650W power supply is the recommended starting point to ensure the system remains stable under heavy sustained rendering loads.
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Feature Analysis:

The 304W power draw represents a substantial thermal reality that dictates your case strategy because this card acts as a consistent heat source under heavy load. You should avoid installing this hardware in a restricted or small-form-factor chassis that lacks significant airflow because the silicon needs to maintain its clock speeds without constant thermal interruption. If your case does not have multiple intake fans and a clear path for exhaust, the internal ambient temperature will climb until the system has to compensate for the heat buildup. High performance requires high wattage, and that energy creates a dense thermal footprint that demands a high-airflow panel to keep the 16GB VRAM pool within its operational limits during long sessions.

You avoid a frequent source of cable frustration because the design uses two standard 8-pin power connectors rather than a more modern or rigid adapter configuration. This choice is a relief for builders using reliable existing power supplies who want to simply click in traditional cables and finish the build. While a base specification might suggest a lower unit, you should use an 800W power supply to provide enough cushion for the system against power spikes and to keep the unit running efficiently. This ensures the delivery of power stays stable even when the hardware is pushed to its absolute limit in the most demanding titles or production tasks.

  • Memory Capacity: The 16GB buffer provides enough space for high-resolution textures so you are not forced to lower settings when modern games allocate large amounts of memory at 1440p.
  • System Integration: The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface offers a wide path for data to travel between the CPU and the rest of the machine, removing communication concerns on the latest motherboard platforms.
  • AI Architecture: Dedicated hardware accelerators provide the local processing muscle needed for RDNA 4.0 features like FSR 4.0 to maintain visual stability.
  • Structural Physicality: The card requires careful mounting and a sturdy motherboard slot due to its size and the cooling assembly needed to manage the 304W output.
  • Build Reliability: Using standard power inputs eliminates the need for specialized cable bending or third-party adapters that can complicate the installation process.

Choosing this hardware is a specific decision to prioritize raw hardware capability over the proprietary software ecosystems that often come with a higher launch MSRP. You are investing in a machine that might run slightly warmer and requires a focused approach to cooling, yet it rewards that effort with a consistent experience that ignores the memory limitations of other mid-range cards. It is an ideal path for a builder who treats their computer as a high-performance tool that benefits from a well-ventilated environment. When you provide the necessary power headroom and air movement to respect the architecture, you get a card that handles the transition into high-resolution textures with a level of ease that justifies the physical requirements of the build.

Intel Arc A750
Feature Analysis:

The 225W power draw stands out as the primary logistical hurdle for a build centered on the Intel Arc A750, as this hardware pulls more electricity than typically expected in this performance tier. While the base technical specification suggests a 550W power supply, you should pair this card with a 650W unit to accommodate the abrupt power spikes that occur during intensive gaming or complex rendering tasks. Providing this extra room ensures that your system does not shut down unexpectedly when the silicon demands a momentary surge of current. Because the card utilizes a standard combination of one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, you can rely on traditional power cables without the need for specialized adapters or the specific clearance requirements of modern high-wattage headers. This straightforward physical installation makes the card compatible with a wide variety of existing cases and legacy power supplies that haven't been updated for the newest standards.

The 8GB VRAM capacity represents a fixed ceiling that dictates your long-term resolution and texture settings regardless of other internal hardware strengths. While the 256-bit memory bus facilitates a high rate of data transfer, the physical volume of memory is small enough that high-resolution texture packs can quickly saturate the buffer. If you push the software beyond this 8GB limit, you are likely to encounter stuttering as the system struggles to manage data overflow between the card and the rest of your PC. It is a build reality that requires a more disciplined approach to settings, where choosing slightly lower presets often yields a much more stable and consistent experience than chasing visual extremes that the hardware cannot technically sustain over time.

Platform compatibility serves as the final non-negotiable requirement because the Xe-HPG architecture relies heavily on Resizable BAR to function at its intended level of performance. You must verify that your motherboard and processor support this feature, as failing to enable it in the BIOS will lead to a significant and noticeable loss in frame consistency and overall speed. This technical dependency makes the card a poor fit for older systems from the pre-2020 era that lack the necessary firmware support. While driver consistency has improved significantly since the initial launch of the platform, the Arc A750 still appeals most to the type of user who enjoys checking for software updates and fine-tuning system configurations to maximize hardware potential.

  • Power Management: The 225W TDP requires a 650W power supply to ensure stability against power fluctuations during heavy use.
  • Memory Boundaries: The 8GB VRAM limit makes 1080p the ideal target resolution to avoid stuttering caused by over-saturated video memory.
  • Cable Setup: Standard 6-pin and 8-pin power connectors provide broad compatibility with existing ATX power supplies.
  • Platform Connectivity: The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a full-speed data path, though the hardware effectively mandates Resizable BAR support.
  • Software Commitment: Optimal results require frequent driver updates and a motherboard BIOS modern enough to support current communication standards.
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Radeon RX 9070 XT
MSRP $599
Release Date 2025-03-06
Chipset Manufacturer AMD
Memory Size 16 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2518 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 644.6 GB/s
Base Clock 1660 MHz
Boost Clock 2970 MHz
Shading Units 4096
Ray Tracing Cores 64
TMUs 256
ROPs 128
Pixel Rate 380.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 760.3 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 97.3 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 48.7 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 1.5 TFLOPS
Architecture RDNA 4.0
Process Size 4 nm
Interface PCIe 5.0 x16
Power Connectors 2x 8-pin
TDP 304 W
Suggested PSU 800 W
Intel Arc A750
Full Tech Specs:
Feature Specification
Name Intel Arc A750
MSRP $269
Release Date 2022-10-12
Chipset Manufacturer Intel
Memory Size 8 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 256 bit
Memory Clock 2000 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s
Base Clock 2050 MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz
Shading Units 3584
Ray Tracing Cores 28
TMUs 224
ROPs 112
Pixel Rate 268.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate 537.6 GTexel/s
Compute Power (FP16) 34.4 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP32) 17.2 TFLOPS
Compute Power (FP64) 2.2 TFLOPS
Architecture Xe-HPG
Process Size 6 nm
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
TDP 225 W
Suggested PSU 650 W

Final Verdict

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is a massive step up from the Intel Arc A750 in every measurable category of hardware capability and architectural sophistication. While the Arc A750 launched at a modest $269 MSRP to target entry-level builds, the Radeon RX 9070 XT arrived with a $599 MSRP and features the much newer RDNA 4.0 architecture built on a 4nm process. This newer node allows for much better efficiency and power density compared to the older Intel Xe-HPG 6nm design. The raw computational gap is staggering as the Radeon card provides nearly three times the floating-point performance which translates to a much smoother experience in demanding titles. This is not just a small increment but a total shift in tier for users who need consistent stability.

Memory management is another area where the Radeon RX 9070 XT pulls far ahead of its competition. With 16GB of GDDR6 on a wide 256-bit bus, it provides double the VRAM of the Intel Arc A750. This extra capacity is vital for modern games that frequently exceed 8GB of usage when using high-quality textures or ray tracing effects. The Intel card often finds itself hitting a wall in heavy workloads where the memory fills up and causes stuttering. Furthermore, the Radeon card supports the newest PCIe 5.0 standard and offers significantly more ray tracing cores to handle lighting and reflections with much better efficiency.

  • Modern Visuals and Media: The Radeon RX 9070 XT utilizes advanced AI upscaling and dedicated hardware for AV1 encoding which makes it a powerhouse for both streaming and high-end gaming.
  • Longevity and Power: With a higher memory bandwidth and more shading units, the Radeon card is better equipped to handle software updates and game engines for years to come while the Intel card remains a basic solution.
  • Buy Radeon RX 9070 XT if you want a card that can handle any workload with massive VRAM headroom and a significant leap in raw power for future-proof gaming.
  • Buy Intel Arc A750 if you are looking for a basic entry-point card at its $269 MSRP and only require standard performance for less demanding applications.

Not sure which part is right for you?

Every gamer is unique. Stop guessing and let our smart engine build a custom rig tailored exactly to your budget and the games you actually play.

Take the PCBuildQuiz!

A Note on Market Volatility

Our mission at PCBuildQuiz is to help you get maximum performance for every dollar by scanning for the best new retail prices 24/7. However, the hardware market can be unpredictable, and specific components like RAM or GPUs may experience temporary price spikes due to shortages. If a price seems unusually high, we recommend checking reputable used marketplaces or waiting for the volatility to settle because we would rather you save money than overpay for a brand new box.

Affiliate Disclaimer

Transparency is key. Some links on this page are affiliate links. This means if you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our servers and keeps our build engine free for everyone.